Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Don't always treat modem stop events as crashes

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:59:47 +0300

Stephen Boyd <[email-masked]> writes:

> Quoting [email-masked] (2021-09-21 22:35:34)
>> On 9/5/21 4:04 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> > +static int ath10k_snoc_modem_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long
> [...]
>>
>> > +
>>
>> > +          return NOTIFY_OK;
>>
>> > +}
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for posting the patch. It would be preferable to use a different flag
>> instead of ATH10K_SNOC_FLAG_UNREGISTERING,
>>
>> since we are not unloading the ath10k driver.

Weird, I don't see pillair's email on patchwork[1] and not in the ath10k
list either. Was it sent as HTML or something?

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email-masked]/

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches