Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add common socket helpers to unify the security hooks

From: Dan Smith <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:43:00 -0700

SH> My only concern here is whether 0 should be passed in by the
SH> caller?  (Not sure, just wondering)

I just figured I'd split up the 0/1 case into getname and getpeer,
mirroring the libc calls.  I don't care either way.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: [email-masked]