Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/02] net/ipv6: seperate sit driver to extra module

From: Samuel Tardieu <[email-masked]>
Date: 06 Oct 2006 13:38:24 +0200

>>>>> "Joerg" == Joerg Roedel <[email-masked]> writes:

Joerg> this is the submit of the patch discussed yesterday to compile
Joerg> the sit driver as a seperate module.

Your patch looks ok to me, but given that many people won't need sit,
why is it enabled by default? Omitting it would save 10k of kernel
text on x86 and people will see the new kernel configuration option
anyway and will enable it if needed.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- [email-masked] -- http://www.rfc1149.net/