Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge port flags

From: Tobias Waldekranz <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:45:03 +0100

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 20:25, Tobias Waldekranz <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Add support for offloading learning and broadcast flooding flags. With
> this in place, mv88e6xx supports offloading of all bridge port flags
> that are currently supported by the bridge.
>
> Broadcast flooding is somewhat awkward to control as there is no
> per-port bit for this like there is for unknown unicast and unknown
> multicast. Instead we have to update the ATU entry for the broadcast
> address for all currently used FIDs.
>
> v2 -> v3:
>   - Only return a netdev from dsa_port_to_bridge_port if the port is
>     currently bridged (Vladimir & Florian)
>
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Ensure that mv88e6xxx_vtu_get handles VID 0 (Vladimir)
>   - Fixed off-by-one in mv88e6xxx_port_set_assoc_vector (Vladimir)
>   - Fast age all entries on port when disabling learning (Vladimir)
>   - Correctly detect bridge flags on LAG ports (Vladimir)
>
> Tobias Waldekranz (8):
>   net: dsa: Add helper to resolve bridge port from DSA port
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid useless attempts to fast-age LAGs
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Provide generic VTU iterator
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use standard helper for broadcast address
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Flood all traffic classes on standalone ports
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge learning flag
>   net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Offload bridge broadcast flooding flag
>
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 270 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c |  21 +++
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h |   2 +
>  include/net/dsa.h                |  14 ++
>  net/dsa/dsa_priv.h               |  14 +-
>  5 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
> -- 
> 2.25.1

Jakub/Dave, is anything blocking this series from going in? I am unable
to find the series on patchwork, is that why?