Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 01/24] mmc: sdio: add SDIO IDs for Silabs WF200 chip

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:45:13 +0200

Ulf Hansson <[email-masked]> writes:

> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 18:14, Jerome Pouiller
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Jérôme Pouiller <[email-masked]>
>>
>> Note that the values used by Silabs are uncommon. A driver cannot fully
>> rely on the SDIO PnP. It should also check if the device is declared in
>> the DT.
>>
>> So, to apply the quirks necessary for the Silabs WF200, we rely on the
>> DT rather than on the SDIO VID/PID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <[email-masked]>
>
> I guess the series is getting close to getting queued up?
>
> As an option to make sure $subject patch doesn't cause a problem for
> that, I can queue it up and send it for the 5.17-rcs or if Kalle
> prefer to carry this in this tree with my ack?
>
> Kalle?

The easiest is if you can take it to your tree, tack!

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches