From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux•com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>, netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail•com>,
John Crispin <john@phrozen•org>,
Bryan.Whitehead@microchip•com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/16] dsa: dsa: Split up creating/destroying of DSA and CPU ports
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:33:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lh2v604y.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464312050-23023-10-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch> writes:
> -static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +void dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy(struct device_node *port_dn)
> {
> - struct device_node *port_dn;
> struct phy_device *phydev;
> +
> + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(port_dn)) {
> + phydev = of_phy_find_device(port_dn);
> + if (phydev) {
> + phy_device_free(phydev);
> + fixed_phy_unregister(phydev);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> int port;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DSA_HWMON
> @@ -445,17 +467,11 @@ static void dsa_switch_destroy(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> dsa_slave_destroy(ds->ports[port].netdev);
> }
>
> - /* Remove any fixed link PHYs */
> + /* Disable configuration of the CPU and DSA ports */
> for (port = 0; port < DSA_MAX_PORTS; port++) {
> - port_dn = ds->ports[port].dn;
> - if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(port_dn)) {
> - phydev = of_phy_find_device(port_dn);
> - if (phydev) {
> - phy_device_free(phydev);
> - of_node_put(port_dn);
Why does dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy drop that of_node_put call?
> - fixed_phy_unregister(phydev);
> - }
> - }
> + if ((dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port)))
> + continue;
Why do we skip DSA and CPU ports here? The previous code didn't.
> + dsa_cpu_dsa_destroy(ds->ports[port].dn);
Thanks,
Vivien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-27 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-27 1:20 [RFC PATCH 00/16] New DSA bind, switches as devices Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] dsa: slave: chip data is optional, don't dereference NULL Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 18:45 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 21:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix circular lock in PPU work Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] dsa: slave: Remove MDIO address from switch MDIO bus name Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] dsa: tag_{e}dsa.c: Remove dependency on platform data Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] dsa: Add a ports structure and use it in the switch structure Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] dsa: Move port device node into port structure Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] dsa: Remove dynamic allocate of routing table Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 18:54 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] dsa: Copy the routing table into the switch structure Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] dsa: dsa: Split up creating/destroying of DSA and CPU ports Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 14:33 ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
2016-05-27 15:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 16:36 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 19:25 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 20:01 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 20:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Only support EDSA tagging Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] net: dsa: Refactor selection of tag ops into a function Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 19:35 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 20:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] dsa: Make mdio bus optional Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 14:55 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 15:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 16:38 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Refactor MDIO so driver registers mdio bus Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 19:45 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] net: dsa: Add new binding implementation Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 20:39 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-05-27 20:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 21:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-05-28 8:23 ` Richard Cochran
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] arm: dt: vf610-zii-devel-b: Make use of new DSA binding Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 1:20 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] dsa: Document new binding Andrew Lunn
2016-05-27 18:30 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] New DSA bind, switches as devices Vivien Didelot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lh2v604y.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl \
--to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux$(echo .)com \
--cc=Bryan.Whitehead@microchip$(echo .)com \
--cc=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=john@phrozen$(echo .)org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox