Subject: Re: [PATCH] fjes: Add missing check for vzalloc

From: Petr Machata <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:40:24 +0200

Chen Ni <[email-masked]> writes:

> Because of the potential failure of the vzalloc(), the hw->hw_info.trace
> could be NULL.
> Therefore, we need to check it and return -ENOMEM in order to transfer
> the error.
>
> Fixes: b6ba737d0b29 ("fjes: ethtool -w and -W support for fjes driver")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c
> index 704e949484d0..3a06a3cf021d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fjes/fjes_hw.c
> @@ -330,6 +330,9 @@ int fjes_hw_init(struct fjes_hw *hw)
>  	ret = fjes_hw_setup(hw);
>  
>  	hw->hw_info.trace = vzalloc(FJES_DEBUG_BUFFER_SIZE);
> +	if (!hw->hw_info.trace)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +

I'm not sure, but shouldn't this call fjes_hw_cleanup() to mirror the
setup() above? Also only if ret=0 I suppose.

>  	hw->hw_info.trace_size = FJES_DEBUG_BUFFER_SIZE;
>  
>  	return ret;