Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ath: ath9k: remove unnecessary code

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 12:21:54 +0000

"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hi Kalle,
>
> Quoting Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>:
>
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email-masked]> writes:
>>
>>> The name of an array used by itself will always return the array's address.
>>> So this test will always evaluate as true.
>>>
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364903
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email-masked]>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>>> index fb80ec8..5c3bc28 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.c
>>> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ bool ath9k_hw_nvram_read(struct ath_hw *ah, u32
>>> off, u16 *data)
>>>
>>>  	if (ah->eeprom_blob)
>>>  		ret = ath9k_hw_nvram_read_firmware(ah->eeprom_blob, off, data);
>>> -	else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom && pdata->eeprom_data)
>>> +	else if (pdata && !pdata->use_eeprom)
>>>  		ret = ath9k_hw_nvram_read_pdata(pdata, off, data);
>>>  	else
>>>  		ret = common->bus_ops->eeprom_read(common, off, data);
>>
>> The patch may very well be valid (didn't check yet) but the commit log
>> is gibberish for me.
>>
>
> Let me correct that and I'll send the patch again.

Thanks.

Also no need to have that long "net: wireless: ath:" prefix, "ath9k: "
or "ath10k: " is enough.

-- 
Kalle Valo