Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 2/2] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi STA devices

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:24:13 +0300

Kari Argillander <[email-masked]> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:00:55AM +0100, Srinivasan Raju wrote:
>> This driver implementation has been based on the zd1211rw driver
>> 
>> Driver is based on 802.11 softMAC Architecture and uses
>> native 802.11 for configuration and management
>> 
>> The driver is compiled and tested in ARM, x86 architectures and
>> compiled in powerpc architecture
>
> Just small style issues in this review.

Very good review comments, kiitos :)

>> +static const struct ieee80211_ops plfxlc_ops = {
>> +	.tx                 = plfxlc_op_tx,
>> +	.start              = plfxlc_op_start,
>> +	.stop               = plfxlc_op_stop,
>> +	.add_interface      = plfxlc_op_add_interface,
>> +	.remove_interface   = plfxlc_op_remove_interface,
>> +	.set_rts_threshold  = purelifi_set_rts_threshold,
>> +	.config             = plfxlc_op_config,
>> +	.configure_filter   = plfxlc_op_configure_filter,
>> +	.bss_info_changed   = plfxlc_op_bss_info_changed,
>> +	.get_stats          = purelifi_get_stats,
>> +	.get_et_sset_count  = purelifi_get_et_sset_count,
>> +	.get_et_stats       = purelifi_get_et_stats,
>> +	.get_et_strings     = purelifi_get_et_strings,
>> +};
>
> Just asking why some prefixes are purelifi and some are plfxlc?

Good point, I guess this is because the driver was called purelifi
before. I think throughout the driver "plfxlc_" should be used and
"purelifi_" should be dropped altogether.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches