Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] net: sched: consistently use rcu_replace_pointer() in taprio_change()

From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:42:18 -0300

Dmitry Antipov <[email-masked]> writes:

> According to Vinicius (and carefully looking through the whole
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa
> once again), txtime branch of 'taprio_change()' is not going to
> race against 'advance_sched()'. But using 'rcu_replace_pointer()'
> in the former may be a good idea as well.
>
> Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <[email-masked]>
> ---
> v5: cut from the series, add syzbot link an re-target to net-next
> v4: adjust subject to target net tree
> v3: unchanged since v2
> v2: added to the series
> ---

Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email-masked]>

Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius