Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] dt-bindings: net: ath11k: document the inputs of the ath11k on WCN6855

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 18:47:09 +0300

Bartosz Golaszewski <[email-masked]> writes:

>> > +  - if:
>> > +      properties:
>> > +        compatible:
>> > +          contains:
>> > +            const: pci17cb,1103
>> > +    then:
>> > +      required:
>> > +        - vddrfacmn-supply
>> > +        - vddaon-supply
>> > +        - vddwlcx-supply
>> > +        - vddwlmx-supply
>> > +        - vddrfa0p8-supply
>> > +        - vddrfa1p2-supply
>> > +        - vddrfa1p8-supply
>> > +        - vddpcie0p9-supply
>> > +        - vddpcie1p8-supply
>>
>> Like we discussed before, shouldn't these supplies be optional as not
>> all modules need them?
>>
>
> The answer is still the same: the ATH11K inside a WCN6855 does - in
> fact - always need them. The fact that the X13s doesn't define them is
> bad representation of HW and I'm fixing it in a subsequent DTS patch.

But, like we discussed earlier, M.2 boards don't need these so I think
this should be optional.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches