From: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb•com>
To: Kenneth Klette Jonassen <kennetkl@ifi•uio.no>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb•com>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google•com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google•com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber•org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 net-next 4/4] tcp: add NV congestion control
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:05:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D20249D6.71D2%brakmo@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA++eYdvYopM+TSiWa+gt4Z0RkjAM2Kyxvga8XodSm4w=kSmxVw@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/5/15, 5:51 PM, "knneth@gmail•com on behalf of Kenneth Klette
Jonassen" <knneth@gmail•com on behalf of kennetkl@ifi•uio.no> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb•com> wrote:
>> This is a request for comments.
>
>Nice to see more development on delay-based congestion control.
>
>It would be good to see how NV stacks up against CDG. Any chance of
>adding cdg as a congestion control parameter to your experiments?
Done. I¹m updating the TCP-NV page with the updated results, should be
done by tomorrow (8/26).
>Experiments on NV without its temporary cwnd reductions would also be
>of interest -- to get a reference of how effective this mechanism is.
Done. It turns out that it only improves fairness a little but hurts
P99 latencies more significantly. So it is now off by default.
Thanks for making me re-examine this feature.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 1:39 [RFC PATCH v5 net-next 0/4] tcp: add NV congestion control Lawrence Brakmo
2015-08-05 1:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 net-next 1/4] tcp: replace cnt & rtt with struct in pkts_acked() Lawrence Brakmo
2015-08-05 1:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 net-next 2/4] tcp: refactor struct tcp_skb_cb Lawrence Brakmo
2015-08-05 1:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 net-next 3/4] tcp: add in_flight to tcp_skb_cb Lawrence Brakmo
2015-08-05 1:39 ` [RFC PATCH v5 net-next 4/4] tcp: add NV congestion control Lawrence Brakmo
2015-08-06 0:51 ` Kenneth Klette Jonassen
2015-08-21 21:29 ` Lawrence Brakmo
2015-08-26 0:05 ` Lawrence Brakmo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D20249D6.71D2%brakmo@fb.com \
--to=brakmo@fb$(echo .)com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb$(echo .)com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=kennetkl@ifi$(echo .)uio.no \
--cc=ncardwell@google$(echo .)com \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
--cc=ycheng@google$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox