Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 4/6] ethtool: extend ringparam setting uAPI with rx_buf_len

From: Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:59:56 +0200

> We think ethtool_ringparam_ext is more easy to understand it is extension of
> struct ethtool_ringparam. However, we don't mind to keep the same way and modify
> to the name kernel_ethtool_ringparam if everyone agrees.
> 
> Does anyone have other opinions?

What has been done most in the past? We should one way to do this, and
consistently use it everywhere in the network stack.

     Andrew