public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia•com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel•org>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel•org>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet•com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor•apana.org.au>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia•com>,
	ipsec-devel <devel@linux-ipsec•org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next v2 0/6] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:01:22 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yv+z0nBW60SBFAmZ@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819084707.7ed64b72@kernel.org>

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 08:47:07AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

> > I invite you to take a look on Jason's presentation "Challenges of the
> > RDMA subsystem", which he gave 3 years ago, about RDMA and challenges
> > with netdev.
> > https://lpc.events/event/4/contributions/364/
> 
> I appreciate the invite, but it's not high enough on my list of interest
> to spend time on.

Regardless, RDMA doesn't really intersect with this netdev work for
XFRM beyond the usual ways that RDMA IP traffic can be captured by or
run parallel to netdev.

A significant use case here is for switchdev modes where the switch
will subject traffic from a switch port to ESP, not unlike it already
does with vlan, vxlan, etc and other already fully offloaded switching
transforms.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-19 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16  8:59 [PATCH xfrm-next v2 0/6] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-16  8:59 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 1/6] xfrm: add new full offload flag Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-16  8:59 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 2/6] xfrm: allow state full offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-18 10:12   ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-18 13:28     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-22  8:01       ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-22  8:46         ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-16  8:59 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 3/6] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-16  8:59 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 4/6] xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec full offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-18 10:24   ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-18 13:34     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-22  8:04       ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-22  8:50         ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-16  8:59 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 5/6] xfrm: add RX datapath protection " Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-18 10:27   ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-18 13:36     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-22  8:06       ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-22  9:35         ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-16  8:59 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 6/6] xfrm: enforce separation between priorities of HW/SW policies Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-17  2:54 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v2 0/6] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-17  5:22   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-17 18:10     ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-18  5:24       ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-18 10:10         ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-18 12:51           ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-19  1:54           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-19  2:34         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-19  5:52           ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-19 15:47             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-19 16:01               ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-08-19 17:53                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-22  8:41                   ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-22  8:54                     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-22 16:33                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-22 21:27                         ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-08-23  0:17                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-23  5:22                             ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-23 14:06                               ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-23  4:48                           ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-26 12:20                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-23  5:34                         ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-18 10:09 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-18 13:26   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-08-22  8:34     ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-22  9:34       ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yv+z0nBW60SBFAmZ@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=devel@linux-ipsec$(echo .)org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)apana.org.au \
    --cc=kuba@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=leon@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=raeds@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox