Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net/mlx5e: Avoid a hundred -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings

From: Saeed Mahameed <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:49:33 -0800

On 20 Feb 10:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:07:07 +1030 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:>
>> Here is another alternative for this.  And similarly to the struct_group_tagged()
>> change above, no struct members should be added before or after `struct
>> mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr hdr;` in `struct mlx5e_umr_wqe`:
>
>Gustavo, could you submit this officially?
>

Can we have struct mlx5e_umr_wq_hdr defined anonymously within
mlx5e_umr_wqe? Let's avoid namespace pollution.