Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: ptp_clock: Fix coding style issues

From: Bagas Sanjaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 14:47:11 +0700

On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 10:01:35PM +0530, Shinu Chandran wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> index 62d4d29e7c05..8fe7f2ce9705 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static int ptp_clock_adjtime(struct posix_clock *pc, struct __kernel_timex *tx)
>  		err = ops->adjtime(ops, delta);
>  	} else if (tx->modes & ADJ_FREQUENCY) {
>  		long ppb = scaled_ppm_to_ppb(tx->freq);
> +
>  		if (ppb > ops->max_adj || ppb < -ops->max_adj)
>  			return -ERANGE;
>  		err = ops->adjfine(ops, tx->freq);
> @@ -278,11 +279,13 @@ struct ptp_clock *ptp_clock_register(struct ptp_clock_info *info,
>  	/* Register a new PPS source. */
>  	if (info->pps) {
>  		struct pps_source_info pps;
> +
>  		memset(&pps, 0, sizeof(pps));
>  		snprintf(pps.name, PPS_MAX_NAME_LEN, "ptp%d", index);
>  		pps.mode = PTP_PPS_MODE;
>  		pps.owner = info->owner;
>  		ptp->pps_source = pps_register_source(&pps, PTP_PPS_DEFAULTS);
> +
>  		if (IS_ERR(ptp->pps_source)) {
>  			err = PTR_ERR(ptp->pps_source);
>  			pr_err("failed to register pps source\n");
> @@ -347,9 +350,8 @@ static int unregister_vclock(struct device *dev, void *data)
>  
>  int ptp_clock_unregister(struct ptp_clock *ptp)
>  {
> -	if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp)) {
> +	if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp))
>  		device_for_each_child(&ptp->dev, NULL, unregister_vclock);
> -	}
>  
>  	ptp->defunct = 1;
>  	wake_up_interruptible(&ptp->tsev_wq);

Two style fixes in one patch (blank lines and braces). Please split
them into each individual patches in a series.

But hey, shouldn't checkpatch complain about one-line brace block?

And also, the patch subject should have been [PATCH net-next]
(targetting next Linux release) or [PATCH net] (targetting current
release).

Thanks!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara