Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: lan966x: Do not check 0 for platform_get_irq_byname()

From: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:32:48 +0200

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:29:00PM +0800, Zhu Wang wrote:
> Since platform_get_irq_byname() never returned zero, so it need not to
> check whether it returned zero, it returned -EINVAL or -ENXIO when
> failed, so we replace the return error code with the result it returned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Wang <[email-masked]>

For non-bugfix Networking patches, it is appropriate to
designate the target tree as 'net-next' rather than '-next'.
(For bug fixes 'net' is appropriate).

Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html

Otherwise, this looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email-masked]>