Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fixed typos on selftests/bpf

From: Martin KaFai Lau <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:21:44 -0800

On 2/14/23 7:21 PM, Taichi Nishimura wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> Thank you for your reviewing.
> I fixed costant and it's to constant and its, respectively.
> 
> Best regards,
> Taichi Nishimura
> 
> Signed-off-by: Taichi Nishimura <[email-masked]>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c
> index a8ba39848bbf..66b304982245 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_cls_redirect.c
> @@ -610,8 +610,8 @@ static INLINING ret_t get_next_hop(buf_t *pkt, encap_headers_t *encap,
>    *
>    *    fill_tuple(&t, foo, sizeof(struct iphdr), 123, 321)
>    *
> - * clang will substitute a costant for sizeof, which allows the verifier
> - * to track it's value. Based on this, it can figure out the constant
> + * clang will substitute a constant for sizeof, which allows the verifier
> + * to track its value. Based on this, it can figure out the constant

This does not apply. Ensure the diff is generated by git, and against the 
bpf-next tree. Please include everything in v1 also, resubmit and tag for 
bpf-next in the subject.