Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 3/4] bpf, sockmap: Adapt for the af_unix-specific lock

From: Martin KaFai Lau <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:43:06 -0800

On 2/11/26 2:02 AM, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> It should also be helpful to be consistent with tcp/udp iter and use
>> lock_sock() instead of lock_sock_fast() in bpf_iter_unix_seq_show().
> OK, I'll tweak that in v3.

Hi, Michal. Are you planning to send v3 soon? I don't think the 
sock_owned_by_user for the non-tracing prog needs to be addressed in the 
same set.