Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] wireless: ath: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API

From: Christian Lamparter <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:12:41 +0200

Hello,

looking at the other patches in this series, I think this patch's 
subject "ath:" tag was supposed to be "carl9170:"?

(so the full subject is:
"wireless: carl9170: convert tasklets to use new tasklet_setup() API")

On 2020-08-17 11:06, Allen Pais wrote:
> From: Allen Pais <[email-masked]>
> 
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the
> struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
> callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
> and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <[email-masked]>
Seems to work.

Acked-by: Christian Lamparter <[email-masked]>

> ---
>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c
> index ead79335823a..e4eb666c6eea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c
> @@ -377,9 +377,9 @@ void carl9170_usb_handle_tx_err(struct ar9170 *ar)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static void carl9170_usb_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> +static void carl9170_usb_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
>   {
> -	struct ar9170 *ar = (struct ar9170 *) data;
> +	struct ar9170 *ar = from_tasklet(ar, t, usb_tasklet);
>   
>   	if (!IS_INITIALIZED(ar))
>   		return;
> @@ -1082,8 +1082,7 @@ static int carl9170_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>   	init_completion(&ar->cmd_wait);
>   	init_completion(&ar->fw_boot_wait);
>   	init_completion(&ar->fw_load_wait);
> -	tasklet_init(&ar->usb_tasklet, carl9170_usb_tasklet,
> -		     (unsigned long)ar);
> +	tasklet_setup(&ar->usb_tasklet, carl9170_usb_tasklet);
>   
>   	atomic_set(&ar->tx_cmd_urbs, 0);
>   	atomic_set(&ar->tx_anch_urbs, 0);
>