Subject: Re: [RFC] arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip conflict verification

From: [email-masked] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:46:15 -0700

Denys Fedoryschenko <[email-masked]> writes:

> On Friday 03 July 2009 23:20:05 David Miller wrote:
>
>> I really never should have applied your initial patch, I severely
>> regret it.  Thanksfully it's reverted now and we can look into
>> this issue more properly.
> If it was said before...
>
> Then maybe i will try to do some new sysctl value?
>
> By default it will be old behavior, but it can be changed to new on user 
> choice.
>
> Let's say 
>
> net.ipv4.arp_proxy_gateway 
> net.ipv4.arp_proxy_gratuitous

How do machines with addresses without routes to them
get packets from machines in other subnets?

Eric