public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission•com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>,
	"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com>,
	"Robin Holt" <holt@sgi•com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	"Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt•eu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, "James Morris" <jmorris@namei•org>,
	"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@netcore•fi>,
	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@trash•net>,
	"Alexey Kuznetsov" <kuznet@ms2•inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: fix min/max handling in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax()
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:38:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1vd5d3ia9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101007121840.ca49e2ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:18:40 -0700")

Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org> writes:

> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:59:03 +0200
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com> wrote:

>> Thats fine by me, thanks Eric.
>> 
>> Andrew, please remove previous patch from your tree and replace it by
>> following one :
>> 
>> [PATCH v2] sysctl: fix min/max handling in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax()
>> 
>> When proc_doulongvec_minmax() is used with an array of longs,
>> and no min/max check requested (.extra1 or .extra2 being NULL), we
>> dereference a NULL pointer for the second element of the array.
>> 
>> Noticed while doing some changes in network stack for the "16TB problem"
>> 
>> Fix is to not change min & max pointers in
>> __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(), so that all elements of the vector share
>> an unique min/max limit, like proc_dointvec_minmax().
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sysctl.c |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> index f88552c..8e45451 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
>> @@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, struct ctl_table *table, int
>>  		kbuf[left] = 0;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	for (; left && vleft--; i++, min++, max++, first=0) {
>> +	for (; left && vleft--; i++, first=0) {
>>  		unsigned long val;
>>  
>>  		if (write) {
>
> Did we check to see whether any present callers are passing in pointers
> to arrays of min/max values?

In 2.6.36 there are not any callers that pass in a vector of anything, I
don't know about linux-next.  It looks to me like incrementing min and
max was simply a bug.

> I wonder if there's any documentation for this interface which just
> became wrong.

Or it just became right.  Clearly no one has been expecting min
and max to be vectors.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-07 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-02 13:17 [PATCH] sysctl: fix min/max handling in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() Eric Dumazet
2010-10-04  3:09 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-04  8:59 ` Robin Holt
2010-10-04  9:04   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-04  9:34     ` Américo Wang
2010-10-04 10:10       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-04 10:35         ` Américo Wang
2010-10-04 10:38           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-05 13:01             ` Américo Wang
2010-10-07  7:18               ` Américo Wang
2010-10-07  9:25                 ` Américo Wang
2010-10-07  9:51                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-07 16:37                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-10-07 16:59                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-07 19:18                         ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-07 19:38                           ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-10-08 16:22                             ` Américo Wang
2010-10-08 16:13                     ` Américo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1vd5d3ia9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission$(echo .)com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=holt@sgi$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2$(echo .)inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pekkas@netcore$(echo .)fi \
    --cc=w@1wt$(echo .)eu \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox