public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox•com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat•com>
Cc: "netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	"jhs@mojatatu•com" <jhs@mojatatu•com>,
	"xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com>,
	"jiri@resnulli•us" <jiri@resnulli•us>,
	"davem@davemloft•net" <davem@davemloft•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/12] net: sched: flower: track filter deletion with flag
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:54:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vbfa7ixjbcl.fsf@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214214926.0cb839a7@redhat.com>


On Thu 14 Feb 2019 at 20:49, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat•com> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:47:04 +0200
> Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox•com> wrote:
>
>> +static int __fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f,
>> +		       bool *last, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>
> This would be easier to follow (at least for me):
>
>>  {
>>  	struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
>>  	bool async = tcf_exts_get_net(&f->exts);
>> -	bool last;
>> -
>> -	idr_remove(&head->handle_idr, f->handle);
>> -	list_del_rcu(&f->list);
>> -	last = fl_mask_put(head, f->mask, async);
>> -	if (!tc_skip_hw(f->flags))
>> -		fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, f, extack);
>> -	tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
>> -	__fl_put(f);
>> +	int err = 0;
>
> without this
>
>> +
>> +	(*last) = false;
>
> with *last = false;
>
>> +
>> +	if (!f->deleted) {
>
> with:
> 	if (f->deleted)
> 		return -ENOENT;
>
>> +		f->deleted = true;
>> +		rhashtable_remove_fast(&f->mask->ht, &f->ht_node,
>> +				       f->mask->filter_ht_params);
>> +		idr_remove(&head->handle_idr, f->handle);
>> +		list_del_rcu(&f->list);
>> +		(*last) = fl_mask_put(head, f->mask, async);
>
> with:
> 	*last = fl_mask_put(head, f->mask, async);
>
>> +		if (!tc_skip_hw(f->flags))
>> +			fl_hw_destroy_filter(tp, f, extack);
>> +		tcf_unbind_filter(tp, &f->res);
>> +		__fl_put(f);
>
> and a return 0; here

Agree, this function looks better when structured in the way you
suggest. Will change it in V2.

>
>> +	} else {
>> +		err = -ENOENT;
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	return last;
>> +	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>> [...]
>>
>> @@ -1520,14 +1541,14 @@ static int fl_delete(struct tcf_proto *tp, void *arg, bool *last,
>>  {
>>  	struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
>>  	struct cls_fl_filter *f = arg;
>> +	bool last_on_mask;
>
> This is unused in this series, maybe change __fl_delete() to optionally
> take NULL as 'bool *last' argument?

It was implemented like that originally, but on internal review with
Jiri we decided that having unused variable here is better than
complicating __fl_delete() with support for "last" being NULL without
good reason.

>
>> +	int err = 0;
>
> Nit: no need to initialise this.

Yes, but I always regret having uninitialized variables in my functions
later on :(

>  
>> -	rhashtable_remove_fast(&f->mask->ht, &f->ht_node,
>> -			       f->mask->filter_ht_params);
>> -	__fl_delete(tp, f, extack);
>> +	err = __fl_delete(tp, f, &last_on_mask, extack);
>>  	*last = list_empty(&head->masks);
>>  	__fl_put(f);
>>  
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void fl_walk(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct tcf_walker *arg,


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-15 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14  7:47 [PATCH net-next 00/12] Refactor flower classifier to remove dependency on rtnl lock Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] net: sched: flower: don't check for rtnl on head dereference Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 19:08   ` Cong Wang
2019-02-19  9:45     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-20 22:33       ` Cong Wang
2019-02-21 17:45         ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-22 19:32           ` Cong Wang
2019-02-25 16:11             ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-25 22:39               ` Cong Wang
2019-02-26 14:57                 ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-28  0:49                   ` Cong Wang
2019-02-28 18:35                     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-03-02  0:51                       ` Cong Wang
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: sched: flower: refactor fl_change Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 20:34   ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 10:38     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 10:47       ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 16:25         ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 18:20           ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] net: sched: flower: introduce reference counting for filters Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 20:34   ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 11:22     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 12:32       ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] net: sched: flower: track filter deletion with flag Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14 20:49   ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-15 15:54     ` Vlad Buslov [this message]
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] net: sched: flower: add reference counter to flower mask Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent mask insertion Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 22:46   ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] net: sched: flower: protect masks list with spinlock Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent filter insertion in fl_change Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent tcf proto deletion Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 20:47   ` Cong Wang
2019-02-19 14:08     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] net: sched: flower: protect flower classifier state with spinlock Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] net: sched: flower: track rtnl lock state Vlad Buslov
2019-02-15 22:46   ` Stefano Brivio
2019-02-18  9:35     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-14  7:47 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] net: sched: flower: set unlocked flag for flower proto ops Vlad Buslov
2019-02-18 19:27   ` Cong Wang
2019-02-19 10:15     ` Vlad Buslov
2019-02-20 22:36       ` Cong Wang
2019-02-18 19:15 ` [PATCH net-next 00/12] Refactor flower classifier to remove dependency on rtnl lock Cong Wang
2019-02-19 10:00   ` Vlad Buslov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vbfa7ixjbcl.fsf@mellanox.com \
    --to=vladbu@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox