public inbox for quic@lists.linux.dev 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, lucien.xin@gmail.com
Cc: steved@redhat.com, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com,
	aahringo@redhat.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
	jbaron@akamai.com, hare@suse.de, kuba@kernel.org, tom@talpey.com,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, daniel@haxx.se, quic@lists.linux.dev,
	jlayton@kernel.org, tfanelli@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linkinjeon@kernel.org, hepengtao@xiaomi.com, pc@manguebit.com,
	kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev, illiliti@protonmail.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com,
	mail@johnericson.me, edumazet@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, smfrench@gmail.com, metze@samba.org,
	mbuhl@openbsd.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com, dreibh@simula.no,
	davem@davemloft.net, sd@queasysnail.net
Subject: Re: [net-next,v9,02/15] net: build socket infrastructure for QUIC protocol
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:48:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9b073b0-60b7-4a45-9b6d-85c15b51fb4f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205115423.2195277-1-horms@kernel.org>

On 2/5/26 12:54 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> 
> For local reproduction steps see https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
> ---
> net: build socket infrastructure for QUIC protocol
> 
> This patch lays the groundwork for QUIC socket support in the kernel.
> It defines the core structures and protocol hooks needed to create
> QUIC sockets, without implementing any protocol behavior at this stage.
> Basic integration is included to allow building the module via
> CONFIG_IP_QUIC=m. This provides the scaffolding necessary for adding
> actual QUIC socket behavior in follow-up patches.
> 
>> diff --git a/net/quic/protocol.c b/net/quic/protocol.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6ab81f1c50cc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/net/quic/protocol.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> @@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>> +static int quic_protosw_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	err = proto_register(&quic_prot, 1);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		return err;
>> +
>> +	err = proto_register(&quicv6_prot, 1);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		proto_unregister(&quic_prot);
>> +		return err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	inet_register_protosw(&quic_stream_protosw);
>> +	inet_register_protosw(&quic_dgram_protosw);
>> +	inet6_register_protosw(&quicv6_stream_protosw);
>> +	inet6_register_protosw(&quicv6_dgram_protosw);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Can the return values from inet6_register_protosw() be checked?
> 
> Looking at the implementation, inet6_register_protosw() returns int and
> can fail with -EINVAL (if p->type >= SOCK_MAX) or -EPERM (if trying to
> override a permanent protocol). The calls at lines 234-235 don't check
> these return values, so if registration fails, quic_protosw_init() still
> returns 0 (success).
> 
> More critically, quic_protosw_exit() unconditionally calls
> inet6_unregister_protosw() on both structures:
> 
> static void quic_protosw_exit(void)
> {
> 	inet_unregister_protosw(&quic_dgram_protosw);
> 	inet_unregister_protosw(&quic_stream_protosw);
> 	proto_unregister(&quic_prot);
> 
> 	inet6_unregister_protosw(&quicv6_dgram_protosw);
> 	inet6_unregister_protosw(&quicv6_stream_protosw);
> 	proto_unregister(&quicv6_prot);
> }
> 
> If a protosw was never successfully registered, its list field remains
> zero-initialized (NULL pointers). inet6_unregister_protosw() calls
> list_del_rcu(&p->list), which with NULL pointers will dereference NULL
> in __list_del_entry() -> __list_del(NULL, NULL), causing a kernel crash.
> 
> Note that inet_register_protosw() returns void (cannot fail from caller's
> perspective), but inet6_register_protosw() returns int (can fail). The
> code correctly checks errors from proto_register() but not from
> inet6_register_protosw().
> 
> Should the return values from inet6_register_protosw() be checked, and
> should the cleanup path track which registrations succeeded so only those
> are unregistered?

I think it's easy to infer that that such failures are impossible, but
since a repost is needed please drop some sentence in the commit message
to help AI see the point.

Thanks,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-02 14:27 [PATCH net-next v9 00/15] net: introduce QUIC infrastructure and core subcomponents Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 01/15] net: define IPPROTO_QUIC and SOL_QUIC constants Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 02/15] net: build socket infrastructure for QUIC protocol Xin Long
2026-02-05 11:54   ` [net-next,v9,02/15] " Simon Horman
2026-02-05 12:48     ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-02-05 19:03       ` Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 03/15] quic: provide common utilities and data structures Xin Long
2026-02-05 11:54   ` [net-next,v9,03/15] " Simon Horman
2026-02-05 12:51     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-02-05 19:18       ` Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 04/15] quic: provide family ops for address and protocol Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 05/15] quic: provide quic.h header files for kernel and userspace Xin Long
2026-02-05 11:55   ` [net-next,v9,05/15] " Simon Horman
2026-02-05 19:37     ` Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 06/15] quic: add stream management Xin Long
2026-02-05 11:55   ` [net-next,v9,06/15] " Simon Horman
2026-02-05 18:56     ` Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 07/15] quic: add connection id management Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 08/15] quic: add path management Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 09/15] quic: add congestion control Xin Long
2026-02-05 11:55   ` [net-next,v9,09/15] " Simon Horman
2026-02-05 19:00     ` Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 10/15] quic: add packet number space Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 11/15] quic: add crypto key derivation and installation Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 12/15] quic: add crypto packet encryption and decryption Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 13/15] quic: add timer management Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 14/15] quic: add packet builder base Xin Long
2026-02-02 14:27 ` [PATCH net-next v9 15/15] quic: add packet parser base Xin Long
2026-02-05 11:55   ` [net-next,v9,15/15] " Simon Horman
2026-02-05 19:02     ` Xin Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9b073b0-60b7-4a45-9b6d-85c15b51fb4f@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel@haxx.se \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dreibh@simula.no \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hepengtao@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=illiliti@protonmail.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mail@johnericson.me \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbuhl@openbsd.org \
    --cc=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.com \
    --cc=quic@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=tfanelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox