public inbox for virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen•com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux•dev>,
	peterz@infradead•org,  david@kernel•org, dave.hansen@intel•com,
	dave.hansen@linux•intel.com,  ypodemsk@redhat•com,
	hughd@google•com, will@kernel•org, aneesh.kumar@kernel•org,
	 npiggin@gmail•com, tglx@linutronix•de, mingo@redhat•com,
	bp@alien8•de,  x86@kernel•org, hpa@zytor•com, arnd@arndb•de,
	ljs@kernel•org, ziy@nvidia•com,  baolin.wang@linux•alibaba.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle•com, npache@redhat•com, ryan.roberts@arm•com,
	 dev.jain@arm•com, baohua@kernel•org, shy828301@gmail•com,
	riel@surriel•com,  jannh@google•com, jgross@suse•com,
	seanjc@google•com, pbonzini@redhat•com,
	 boris.ostrovsky@oracle•com, virtualization@lists•linux.dev,
	kvm@vger•kernel.org,  linux-arch@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack•org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	 ioworker0@gmail•com, roman.gushchin@linux•dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7.2 v10 0/2] skip redundant sync IPIs when TLB flush sent them
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:37:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aetw4aoABYj3keMh@plex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424063024.ce42ee6a5546e4d9337dd007@linux-foundation.org>

On 04-24 06:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:25:26 +0800 Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux•dev> wrote:
> 
> > When page table operations require synchronization with software/lockless
> > walkers, they call tlb_remove_table_sync_{one,rcu}() after flushing the
> > TLB (tlb->freed_tables or tlb->unshared_tables).
> > 
> > On architectures where the TLB flush already sends IPIs to all target CPUs,
> > the subsequent sync IPI broadcast is redundant. This is not only costly on
> > large systems where it disrupts all CPUs even for single-process page table
> > operations, but has also been reported to hurt RT workloads[1].
> > 
> > This series introduces tlb_table_flush_implies_ipi_broadcast() to check if
> > the prior TLB flush already provided the necessary synchronization. When
> > true, the sync calls can early-return.
> > 
> > A few cases rely on this synchronization:
> > 
> > 1) hugetlb PMD unshare[2]: The problem is not the freeing but the reuse
> >    of the PMD table for other purposes in the last remaining user after
> >    unsharing.
> > 
> > 2) khugepaged collapse[3]: Ensure no concurrent GUP-fast before collapsing
> >    and (possibly) freeing the page table / re-depositing it.
> 
> Sashiko questions:
> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260424062528.71951-1-lance.yang@linux.dev
> 
> (I never know if my Sashiko emails are welcome/useful.  Maybe Sashiko
> said the same stuff about v9 and it's all wrong.  But better safe than
> sorry!)

These emails are helpful; but, I do not believe you should have to 
manually follow up with a link to every new patch series.

Perhaps  Sashiko could automatically send a summary email in response to 
the cover letter, or provide a link once the reviews are complete. For 
the kexec ML, we opted-in with Roman to receive automated emails from 
sashiko.

+Cc: Roman.

> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-24 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-24  6:25 [PATCH 7.2 v10 0/2] skip redundant sync IPIs when TLB flush sent them Lance Yang
2026-04-24  6:25 ` [PATCH 7.2 v10 1/2] mm/mmu_gather: prepare to skip redundant sync IPIs Lance Yang
2026-04-24 15:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 15:52     ` Dave Hansen
2026-05-27  1:44       ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 15:40   ` Lance Yang
2026-04-24  6:25 ` [PATCH 7.2 v10 2/2] x86/tlb: skip redundant sync IPIs for native TLB flush Lance Yang
2026-04-24 15:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 15:49     ` Lance Yang
2026-04-24 13:30 ` [PATCH 7.2 v10 0/2] skip redundant sync IPIs when TLB flush sent them Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 13:37   ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-04-24 14:15     ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 14:20       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 14:31         ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 14:40           ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-24 18:36           ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 18:50             ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-04-24 19:01               ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 19:12                 ` Zi Yan
2026-04-24 19:15                   ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-04-25  0:58                     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-24 19:22                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 19:35                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 20:03                       ` Roman Gushchin
2026-04-24 20:11                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-29 11:10                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 19:08               ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 19:09               ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 19:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-24 19:24                   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-24 19:18                 ` Yosry Ahmed
2026-04-25  1:12                   ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-25  5:17                   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-25 11:36                     ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-27  8:53                       ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-25  1:19           ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aetw4aoABYj3keMh@plex \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle$(echo .)com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=baohua@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux$(echo .)alibaba.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bp@alien8$(echo .)de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hughd@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jannh@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jgross@suse$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kvm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=npache@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=riel@surriel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=seanjc@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists$(echo .)linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=x86@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=ypodemsk@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox