* git-gc --prune interferes cogito?
@ 2007-10-17 14:43 MichaelTiloDressel
2007-10-17 15:38 ` Petr Baudis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: MichaelTiloDressel @ 2007-10-17 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hi,
I'm using git-1.5.3.2 and cogito-0.18.1.
After I did a git-gc --prune cg-status didn't show my branches anymore.
git-branch -a still showed the branches.
I think that git-gc removed all files from .git/refs/heads/ except for
origin. Git seams to be fine with the branches in
.git/logs/refs/heads/.
So should git-gc not be used together with cogito?
Cheers,
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: git-gc --prune interferes cogito?
2007-10-17 14:43 git-gc --prune interferes cogito? MichaelTiloDressel
@ 2007-10-17 15:38 ` Petr Baudis
2007-10-17 18:55 ` Michael Dressel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petr Baudis @ 2007-10-17 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MichaelTiloDressel@t-online•de; +Cc: git
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:43:27PM +0200, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online•de wrote:
> I'm using git-1.5.3.2 and cogito-0.18.1.
>
> After I did a git-gc --prune cg-status didn't show my branches anymore.
> git-branch -a still showed the branches.
> I think that git-gc removed all files from .git/refs/heads/ except for
> origin. Git seams to be fine with the branches in
> .git/logs/refs/heads/.
>
> So should git-gc not be used together with cogito?
Cogito doesn't support packed heads - I guess setting gc.packrefs to
false should fix the issue. Cogito should support packed tags, I guess;
I don't know if there's a way to make git-gc pack only tags.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Early to rise and early to bed makes a male healthy and wealthy and dead.
-- James Thurber
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: git-gc --prune interferes cogito?
2007-10-17 15:38 ` Petr Baudis
@ 2007-10-17 18:55 ` Michael Dressel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Dressel @ 2007-10-17 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Baudis; +Cc: git
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:43:27PM +0200, MichaelTiloDressel@t-online•de wrote:
> > I'm using git-1.5.3.2 and cogito-0.18.1.
> >
> > After I did a git-gc --prune cg-status didn't show my branches anymore.
> > git-branch -a still showed the branches.
> > I think that git-gc removed all files from .git/refs/heads/ except for
> > origin. Git seams to be fine with the branches in
> > .git/logs/refs/heads/.
> >
> > So should git-gc not be used together with cogito?
>
> Cogito doesn't support packed heads - I guess setting gc.packrefs to
> false should fix the issue. Cogito should support packed tags, I guess;
> I don't know if there's a way to make git-gc pack only tags.
>
Thank you. I tried it at home too where I had an older version of git.
With the older git version git-gc --prune didn't disturbe cogito.
I upgradet to git version 1.5.3.4 and tried gc.packrefs=false and it
seams to be ok forr cogito.
Cheers,
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-17 18:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-17 14:43 git-gc --prune interferes cogito? MichaelTiloDressel
2007-10-17 15:38 ` Petr Baudis
2007-10-17 18:55 ` Michael Dressel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox