From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail•com>
To: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha•warpmail.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>,
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail•com>, git <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to selectively recreate merge state?
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:00:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912111500.51982.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B223C1E.6010403@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Dnia piątek 11. grudnia 2009 13:33, Michael J Gruber napisał:
> Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 11.12.2009 12:20:
>> Dnia piątek 11. grudnia 2009 11:44, Michael J Gruber napisał:
>>> Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 11.12.2009 02:33:
>>>> Dnia piątek 11. grudnia 2009 02:11, Junio C Hamano napisał:
>>>>> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail•com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> --unresolve::
>>>>>> Restores the 'unmerged' or 'needs updating' state of a
>>>>>> file during a merge if it was cleared by accident.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unless "git add foo" not only adds current contents of foo at stage 0,
>>>>>> but also removes higher stages from index...
>>>>>
>>>>> By definition, adding anything at stage #0 is to remove higher stages.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm... let's test it:
>>>>
>>>> $ git merge side-branch
>>>> Auto-merging foo
>>>> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo
>>>> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
>>>> $ git ls-files --stage
>>>> 100644 257cc5642cb1a054f08cc83f2d943e56fd3ebe99 1 foo
>>>> 100644 3bd1f0e29744a1f32b08d5650e62e2e62afb177c 2 foo
>>>> 100644 469a41eda5c8b45503a3bfc32ad6b5decc658132 3 foo
>>>> $ <edit foo>
>>>> $ git add foo
>>>> $ git ls-files --stage
>>>> 100644 a1b58d38ffa61e8e99b7cb95cdf540aedf2a96b3 0 foo
>>
>> I thought that "git add foo" only adds current contents of foo in stage 0,
>> and does not delete other stages.
>>
>> Unless "git add foo" does more than "git update-index foo" does here.
>
> Quoting Junio:
>
> By definition, adding anything at stage #0 is to remove higher stages.
>
> Could one leave 1 alone but still mark the conflict resolved?
I have thought that if there exist stage #0 in index, git simply _ignores_
higher stages, so git-add simply adds stage #0 and does not delete higher
stages.
But I see that "git update-index --unresolve" (and its predecessor
"git-unresolve") simply recreate stages #2 and #3.
The documentation of "git update-index --unresolve" lacks this info,
and it doesn't tell one what it is for (see commit message for commit
ec16779 (Add git-unresolve <paths>..., 2006-04-19)).
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-11 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-10 23:56 How to selectively recreate merge state? Jay Soffian
2009-12-11 0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 0:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11 1:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 1:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11 10:44 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-12-11 11:09 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-11 12:51 ` Thomas Rast
2009-12-11 11:20 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11 12:33 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-12-11 14:00 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2009-12-11 14:57 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-12-11 15:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 19:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 22:18 ` Jay Soffian
2009-12-11 23:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 9:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Update advice in commit/status output Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] commit/status: check $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD only once Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 9:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 9:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] status/commit: do not suggest "reset HEAD <path>" while merging Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve Jeff King
2009-12-12 9:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 9:19 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-12-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 0/3] Update advice in commit/status output Sverre Rabbelier
2009-12-12 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 22:06 ` Jay Soffian
2009-12-11 20:38 ` How to selectively recreate merge state? Paolo Bonzini
2009-12-11 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912111500.51982.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@drmicha$(echo .)warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox