public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha•warpmail.net>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail•com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>,
	Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail•com>, git <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to selectively recreate merge state?
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:57:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B225DC0.4020603@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912111500.51982.jnareb@gmail.com>

Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 11.12.2009 15:00:
> Dnia piątek 11. grudnia 2009 13:33, Michael J Gruber napisał:
>> Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 11.12.2009 12:20:
>>> Dnia piątek 11. grudnia 2009 11:44, Michael J Gruber napisał:
>>>> Jakub Narebski venit, vidit, dixit 11.12.2009 02:33:
>>>>> Dnia piątek 11. grudnia 2009 02:11, Junio C Hamano napisał:
>>>>>> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail•com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   --unresolve::
>>>>>>>         Restores the 'unmerged' or 'needs updating' state of a
>>>>>>>         file during a merge if it was cleared by accident.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unless "git add foo" not only adds current contents of foo at stage 0,
>>>>>>> but also removes higher stages from index...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By definition, adding anything at stage #0 is to remove higher stages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm... let's test it:
>>>>>
>>>>>  $ git merge side-branch 
>>>>>  Auto-merging foo
>>>>>  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo
>>>>>  Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
>>>>>  $ git ls-files --stage
>>>>>  100644 257cc5642cb1a054f08cc83f2d943e56fd3ebe99 1       foo
>>>>>  100644 3bd1f0e29744a1f32b08d5650e62e2e62afb177c 2       foo
>>>>>  100644 469a41eda5c8b45503a3bfc32ad6b5decc658132 3       foo
>>>>>  $ <edit foo>
>>>>>  $ git add foo
>>>>>  $ git ls-files --stage
>>>>>  100644 a1b58d38ffa61e8e99b7cb95cdf540aedf2a96b3 0       foo
>>>
>>> I thought that "git add foo" only adds current contents of foo in stage 0,
>>> and does not delete other stages.
>>>  
>>> Unless "git add foo" does more than "git update-index foo" does here.
>>
>> Quoting Junio:
>>
>> By definition, adding anything at stage #0 is to remove higher stages.
>>
>> Could one leave 1 alone but still mark the conflict resolved?
> 
> I have thought that if there exist stage #0 in index, git simply _ignores_
> higher stages, so git-add simply adds stage #0 and does not delete higher
> stages.
> 
> But I see that "git update-index --unresolve" (and its predecessor 
> "git-unresolve") simply recreate stages #2 and #3.
> 
> 
> The documentation of "git update-index --unresolve" lacks this info,
> and it doesn't tell one what it is for (see commit message for commit
> ec16779 (Add git-unresolve <paths>..., 2006-04-19)).
> 

Oh yes, one should always read the classics ;) [Really nice commit
message, that is.]

Michael

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-11 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-10 23:56 How to selectively recreate merge state? Jay Soffian
2009-12-11  0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11  0:28   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11  1:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11  1:33       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11 10:44         ` Michael J Gruber
2009-12-11 11:09           ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-12-11 12:51             ` Thomas Rast
2009-12-11 11:20           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11 12:33             ` Michael J Gruber
2009-12-11 14:00               ` Jakub Narebski
2009-12-11 14:57                 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2009-12-11 15:35                   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 19:24                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-11 22:18                   ` Jay Soffian
2009-12-11 23:46                     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12  9:02                       ` [PATCH 0/3] Update advice in commit/status output Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12  9:02                         ` [PATCH 1/3] commit/status: check $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD only once Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12  9:02                           ` [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12  9:02                             ` [PATCH 3/3] status/commit: do not suggest "reset HEAD <path>" while merging Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12  9:15                             ` [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve Jeff King
2009-12-12  9:24                               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12  9:19                             ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-12-12 16:13                         ` [PATCH 0/3] Update advice in commit/status output Sverre Rabbelier
2009-12-12 18:27                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-12 22:06                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-12-11 20:38             ` How to selectively recreate merge state? Paolo Bonzini
2009-12-11 21:14               ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B225DC0.4020603@drmicha.warpmail.net \
    --to=git@drmicha$(echo .)warpmail.net \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jaysoffian@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox