public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Dodd <mats.dodd12@gmail•com>
To: git@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google•com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de>,
	Mats-Dodd <mats.dodd12@gmail•com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] upload-pack: send shallow-info before wanted-refs in protocol v2
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 01:35:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251224003504.52660-2-mats.dodd12@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251224003504.52660-1-mats.dodd12@gmail.com>

From: Mats-Dodd <mats.dodd12@gmail•com>

The protocol v2 specification (Documentation/gitprotocol-v2.adoc) defines
the ordering of optional sections in the fetch response as:

    [acknowledgments delim-pkt] [shallow-info delim-pkt]
    [wanted-refs delim-pkt] [packfile-uris delim-pkt]
    packfile flush-pkt

However, since the ref-in-want feature was introduced in 516e2b76bdc
(upload-pack: implement ref-in-want, 2018-06-27), the server sends
wanted-refs before shallow-info. This violates the specification and
breaks the client (fetch-pack.c), which expects shallow-info first.

When a client performs a shallow clone/fetch against a server with
uploadpack.allowRefInWant=true, the client receives sections in the
wrong order and fails with:

    fatal: expected 'packfile', received 'shallow-info'

Fix by swapping the order of send_shallow_info() and
send_wanted_ref_info() to match both the protocol specification and
client expectations.

Signed-off-by: Mats-Dodd <mats.dodd12@gmail•com>
---
 upload-pack.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
index 1e87ae9559..029ca93e69 100644
--- a/upload-pack.c
+++ b/upload-pack.c
@@ -1830,8 +1830,8 @@ int upload_pack_v2(struct repository *r, struct packet_reader *request)
 				state = UPLOAD_DONE;
 			break;
 		case UPLOAD_SEND_PACK:
-			send_wanted_ref_info(&data);
 			send_shallow_info(&data);
+			send_wanted_ref_info(&data);
 
 			if (data.uri_protocols.nr) {
 				create_pack_file(&data, &data.uri_protocols);
-- 
2.47.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-24  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-24  0:35 [PATCH 0/2] Fix shallow clone with ref-in-want enabled Matthew Dodd
2025-12-24  0:35 ` Matthew Dodd [this message]
2026-01-05 13:00   ` [PATCH 1/2] upload-pack: send shallow-info before wanted-refs in protocol v2 Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-24  0:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] t5703: add test for shallow fetch with ref-in-want Matthew Dodd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251224003504.52660-2-mats.dodd12@gmail.com \
    --to=mats.dodd12@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
    --cc=bmwill@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox