public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha•warpmail.net>
To: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web•de>
Cc: Thomas Rast <trast@student•ethz.ch>,
	Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail•com>, git list <git@vger•kernel.org>,
	Jeff King <peff@peff•net>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>,
	Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce•org>
Subject: Re: The GitTogether
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:17:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5016894C.7020907@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50155CD9.6060702@web.de>

Jens Lehmann venit, vidit, dixit 29.07.2012 17:55:
> Am 27.07.2012 13:45, schrieb Thomas Rast:
>> Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail•com> writes:
>>
>>> GitHub would like to volunteer to organize and pay for these events
>>> this year.  I would like to hold the developer-centric one in Berlin
>>> in early October

Winter term classes start 10/15. Before 10/15 it will be easier to book
university rooms if we need that.

>>
>> Yay, Berlin!  I would be glad to join there; I would probably not have
>> the time and resources to travel to SF this year.
> 
> Same here.

Same.

Do we have contacts regarding (un)conference rooms in Berlin already? I
might be able to ask around.

> 
>>> For those of you who *have* been to a GitTogether, what did you find
>>> useful and/or useless about it?  What did you get out of it and would
>>> like to see again?  For those of you who have never been, what do you
>>> think would be useful?  I was thinking for both of them to have a
>>> combination of short prepared talks, lightning/unconference style
>>> talks and general discussion / breakout sessions.
>>
>> I was at the 2010 GitTogether in Mountain View.  I really liked the
>> unconference format, and the way Shawn and Junio used it: just using the
>> topic stickers as a sort of todo-list, not actually fixing any schedule
>> in advance.  Oddly enough we also managed to avoid the usual consequence
>> of open-ended discussions: getting stuck endlessly on an absolutely
>> insignificant point.
> 
> Yup, the unconference format with both common and breakout sessions
> worked really well.
> 
>> I think the discussions were very productive.  I would love to do more
>> hacking than we managed in 2010, but I realize that this is not possible
>> if we just meet for 2-3 days.  Perhaps one option would be to plan for
>> 1-2 days of hacking after the discussion rounds, so that the interested
>> people can stay a bit longer?
> 
> I really like that idea and would vote for 3-4 days (maybe including a
> weekend for those of us who have to take a leave from work ;-).
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-30 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26 22:28 The GitTogether Scott Chacon
2012-07-27  6:12 ` Heiko Voigt
2012-07-27 11:45 ` Thomas Rast
2012-07-29 15:55   ` Jens Lehmann
2012-07-30 13:17     ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2012-08-09 16:38       ` Michael J Gruber
2012-08-10 14:42         ` Patrick Renaud
2012-08-10 16:30           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 13:43 ` Michael Haggerty
2012-09-20 18:53   ` Sebastian Schuberth
2012-09-21  9:20     ` Christian Couder
2012-09-21 14:05       ` Shawn Pearce
2012-09-21 14:18         ` Jeff King
2012-09-21 15:23         ` Christian Couder
2012-09-21 16:43           ` Patrick Renaud
2012-09-21 16:45             ` Scott Chacon
2012-09-21 16:55               ` Patrick Renaud
2012-09-21 16:57                 ` Luca Milanesio
2012-09-21 14:19       ` Scott Chacon
2012-09-21 14:33         ` Sebastian Schuberth
2012-09-22 10:12           ` Michael J Gruber
2012-09-22 10:45             ` Sebastian Schuberth
2012-09-22 18:09             ` Enrico Weigelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5016894C.7020907@drmicha.warpmail.net \
    --to=git@drmicha$(echo .)warpmail.net \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web$(echo .)de \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    --cc=schacon@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce$(echo .)org \
    --cc=trast@student$(echo .)ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox