From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery•net>
To: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail•com>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] replace signal() with sigaction()
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:40:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53859307.8080506@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401257655-6043-1-git-send-email-jmmahler@gmail.com>
Am 5/28/2014 8:14, schrieb Jeremiah Mahler:
> From signal(2)
>
> The behavior of signal() varies across UNIX versions, and has also var‐
> ied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use:
> use sigaction(2) instead. See Portability below.
>
> This patch set replaces calls to signal() with sigaction() in all files
> except sigchain.c. sigchain.c is a bit more complicated than the others
> and will be done in a separate patch.
In compat/mingw.c we have:
int sigaction(int sig, struct sigaction *in, struct sigaction *out)
{
if (sig != SIGALRM)
return errno = EINVAL,
error("sigaction only implemented for SIGALRM");
if (out != NULL)
return errno = EINVAL,
error("sigaction: param 3 != NULL not implemented");
timer_fn = in->sa_handler;
return 0;
}
Notice "only implemented for SIGALRM". Are adding the missing signals
somewhere (here or in a later patch)?
> Jeremiah Mahler (5):
> progress.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> daemon.c run_service(): replace signal() with sigaction()
> daemon.c child_handler(): replace signal() with sigaction()
> daemon.c service_loop(): replace signal() with sigaction()
> connect.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>
> connect.c | 5 ++++-
> daemon.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> progress.c | 6 +++++-
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Isn't this a bit too much of code churn, given that there were no bug
reports where signal handling is identified as the culprit despite
the warning you cited above?
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 6:14 [PATCH 0/5] replace signal() with sigaction() Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 6:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] progress.c: " Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 8:07 ` Chris Packham
2014-05-28 8:19 ` David Kastrup
2014-05-28 8:48 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2014-05-28 9:11 ` David Kastrup
2014-05-28 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-05-28 15:45 ` Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 6:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] daemon.c run_service(): " Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 6:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] daemon.c child_handler(): " Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 6:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] daemon.c service_loop(): " Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 6:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] connect.c: " Jeremiah Mahler
2014-05-28 7:40 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2014-05-28 8:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Chris Packham
2014-05-28 8:23 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2014-05-28 16:11 ` Jeremiah Mahler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53859307.8080506@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery$(echo .)net \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=jmmahler@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox