From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail•com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2023, #01; Mon, 2)
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 23:59:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lecgeqfu.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqjzs1mkma.fsf@gitster.g> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2023 03:25:33 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com> writes:
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail•com> writes:
[...]
>>> If I have to pick a candidate for "get me diff" that is the most
>>> useful among those currently are available, it is "give patches to
>>> all single-parent commit, and show tricky conflict resolution part
>>> only for merge commits".
>>
>> I'm afraid you need to pick a candidate that will be natural for '-d',
>> not just most useful output for your workflows, whatever it happens to
>> be.
>
> Literal match to word "diff" does not necessarily mean it is useful,
Sure, who argues? I don't.
> and short-and-sweet single-letter option name is primarily about
> letting users reach useful features with minimum typing [*1*], so you
> cannot avoid "most useful" being a large part of the equation.
I don't try to avoid "most useful" either, quite opposite. With whom do
you argue?
I just pointed that a short-cut would better be natural (or mnemonic)
/as well/, so you probably don't actually want:
-d:
give patches to all single-parent commits, and show tricky conflict
resolution part only for merge commits.
, or do you?
Overall, as an example, I'd understand if you had deflected the patch
with "let's rather use -d for '--decorate=short', or '--date=relative'",
or something like that, but you don't, leaving me uncertain about your
actual worries and intentions.
Anyway, I re-submitted the patches avoiding precious, too hard to
deserve single-letter option.
Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-03 0:30 What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2023, #01; Mon, 2) Junio C Hamano
2023-10-03 7:01 ` Sergey Organov
2023-10-03 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-03 17:59 ` Sergey Organov
2023-10-04 8:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-04 11:18 ` Sergey Organov
2023-10-05 10:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-05 20:59 ` Sergey Organov [this message]
2023-10-05 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-06 18:02 ` Sergey Organov
2023-10-04 1:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-10-04 16:28 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lecgeqfu.fsf@osv.gnss.ru \
--to=sorganov@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox