public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl•com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks•im>, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] last-modified: better document how depth in handled
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 12:01:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tsy9w3k1.fsf@iotcl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aS1uz6mc0WW9kjzN@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks•im> writes:

> Hm, that's confusing indeed. Is it possible for git-last-modified(1) to
> do the "right thing" automatically? That is, given "sub/file", show when
> that specific file has been last modified? Or is there a good
> (non-technical) reason it behaves the way it does?

You bring up a good point. In the version of git-blame-tree(1) that
GitHub did share, the `--recursive` flag is enabled by default. So if
you pass a file path to the command, you'll get the "right thing". But
as I am pointing out in this patch, if you pass a subtree, everything in
that subtree is shown too. You could argue this is the "right thing".

Anyhow, in the version of git-last-modified(1) I submitted upstream,
recursive is not enabled by default. My reason, at the time option
--max-depth wasn't implemented yet. I submitted those changes in a
separate series (these patches also originate from GitHub by the way).
If those patches wouldn't land, I think always-on recursive behavior for
git-last-modified(1) would be quite annoying.

So long story short, as git-last-modified(1) is still marked as
"EXPERIMENTAL", shall we make recursive always-on?

-- 
Cheers,
Toon

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-02 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-26  6:09 [PATCH 0/3] Expand and enhance git-last-modified(1) documentation Toon Claes
2025-11-26  6:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] last-modified: handle and document NUL termination Toon Claes
2025-11-26 13:03   ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-26 16:57   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-28 18:50     ` Toon Claes
2025-12-01 10:32       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-26  6:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] last-modified: document option --max-depth Toon Claes
2025-11-26 13:31   ` Karthik Nayak
2026-01-16 12:13     ` Toon Claes
2025-11-26 19:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-28 18:51     ` Toon Claes
2025-11-26  6:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] last-modified: better document how depth in handled Toon Claes
2025-11-26 17:38   ` Eric Sunshine
2025-12-01 10:32   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-02 11:01     ` Toon Claes [this message]
2025-12-02 17:14       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-16 13:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Change git-last-modified(1) default behavior and add documentation Toon Claes
2026-01-16 13:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] last-modified: document NUL termination Toon Claes
2026-01-16 13:22   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] last-modified: add option '-z' to help output Toon Claes
2026-01-16 18:31     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-16 13:22   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] last-modified: document option --max-depth Toon Claes
2026-01-16 13:22   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] last-modified: add option '--max-depth' to help output Toon Claes
2026-01-16 18:42     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-16 13:22   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] last-modified: change default max-depth to 0 Toon Claes
2026-01-16 18:55     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-16 13:34   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Change git-last-modified(1) default behavior and add documentation Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-01-20 10:44     ` Toon Claes
2026-01-20 21:47   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Toon Claes
2026-01-20 21:47     ` [PATCH v3 1/4] last-modified: clarify in the docs the command takes a pathspec Toon Claes
2026-01-20 21:47     ` [PATCH v3 2/4] last-modified: document option '-z' Toon Claes
2026-01-20 21:47     ` [PATCH v3 3/4] last-modified: document option '--max-depth' Toon Claes
2026-01-20 21:47     ` [PATCH v3 4/4] last-modified: change default max-depth to 0 Toon Claes
2026-01-25 11:24       ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-01-21 18:40     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Change git-last-modified(1) default behavior and add documentation Junio C Hamano
2026-02-03  9:58       ` Karthik Nayak
2026-02-03 17:42         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tsy9w3k1.fsf@iotcl.com \
    --to=toon@iotcl$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr$(echo .)com \
    --cc=ps@pks$(echo .)im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox