public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp•fr>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail•com>,
	git@vger•kernel.org, "Sebastian Pipping" <webmaster@hartwork•org>,
	"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira•uka.de>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:51:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpq4o7mfzd1.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd3maelbh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:40:18 -0800")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com> writes:

> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp•fr> writes:
>
>> I think promoting "git add -u ." more than a configuration option would
>> reduce the pain.
>
> Yeah, I tend to agree.
>
>> As a user, if I get used to typing "git add -u ." instead of "git add -u", 
>> I get the current behavior regardless of the version of Git, without a
>> warning. Later, when all the machines I word on support the tree-wide
>> "git add -u" (either 1.7.x + some configuration or 1.8.y), I'll use it
>> as a new feature.
>
> Once your users (you as a script writer) have an option to set the
> configuration to participate in the tree-wide party early, you would need
> to update your scripts immediately so that they don't break on them;

But "update" should mean "replace git add -u with git add -u .", which
is the portable way to do the same.

> so the introduction of the configuration becomes a flag-day event.
> Hmph...

The introduction of the config variable is a non-event if you already
use the portable . notation.

>> So, a warning like
>>
>>   warning: the behavior of "git add -u" without pathspec will change in
>>   Git 1.8.0. To keep the current behavior, use this instead:
>>   
>>       git add -u .
>>   
>>   + explanations about the config options as already discussed here
>>
>> would be fine.
>
> Yeah, I think you convinced me that an elaborate configuration wouldn't
> help us at all.  We just keep warning in 1.7.x series when "add -u" didn't
> see any pathspec, and flip the default at 1.8.0
>
> Simpler and cleaner ;-)

I think is still makes sense to have a config variable, so that people
who want the new behavior can get it ASAP. Right after 1.8 is out, I'll
still have machines where I'm too lazy to install a brand new Git, and
I'll want to get the 1.8 goodness for free ;-).

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-01 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07  2:27 [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-02-07  5:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07  6:14   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-07  6:26     ` Miles Bader
2011-02-09 10:58     ` Joshua Juran
2011-02-07 12:09   ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-27 10:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-27 11:43   ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-27 17:04     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 13:35   ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-27 17:01     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 16:52   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 19:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-28  6:37       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-28  6:56         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 11:22           ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-03-01 13:46             ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 14:15               ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-03-01 14:53           ` Matthieu Moy
2011-03-01 18:40             ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 18:51               ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2011-03-01 19:36                 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-03-01 20:00                 ` Jeff King
2011-03-01 20:12                 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 20:25                   ` Matthieu Moy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vpq4o7mfzd1.fsf@bauges.imag.fr \
    --to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    --cc=szeder@ira$(echo .)uka.de \
    --cc=webmaster@hartwork$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox