From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] revision: introduce --exclude=<glob> to tame wildcards
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:55:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1u5aybri.fsf_-_@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqeh9b15x6.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:48:05 -0700")
People often find "git log --branches" etc. that includes _all_
branches is cumbersome to use when they want to grab most but except
some. The same applies to --tags, --all and --glob.
Teach the revision machinery to remember patterns, and then upon the
next such a globbing option, exclude those that match the pattern.
With this, I can view only my integration branches (e.g. maint,
master, etc.) without topic branches, which are named after two
letters from primary authors' names, slash and topic name.
git rev-list --no-walk --exclude=??/* --branches |
git name-rev --refs refs/heads/* --stdin
This one shows things reachable from local and remote branches that
have not been merged to the integration branches.
git log --remotes --branches --not --exclude=??/* --branches
It may be a bit rough around the edges, in that the pattern to give
the exclude option depends on what globbing option follows. In
these examples, the pattern "??/*" is used, not "refs/heads/??/*",
because the globbing option that follows the -"-exclude=<pattern>"
is "--branches". As each use of globbing option resets previously
set "--exclude", this may not be such a bad thing, though.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
---
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com> writes:
> It may be a good idea to step back a bit and think of this topic as
> a way to enhance the --branches option and its friends with only the
> inclusive wildcard semantics. It lets us include those that match
> the pattern with "--branches=wip/*", but there is no way to say "oh
> by the way, I do not want those that match this pattern included
> when you expand this short-hand". We have --branches=pattern that
> is inclusive; perhaps it can be prefixed with --branches=!pattern to
> pre-declare "whatever the next --branches expands to, do not include
> those that match this pattern", or something, which would make the
> earlier "wip" example to be:
>
> --all --not --branches='!wip/*' --branches
So here is a quick attempt at that approach, which does not look
too intrusive.
revision.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
revision.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 84ccc05..3e82874 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -1180,11 +1180,28 @@ struct all_refs_cb {
const char *name_for_errormsg;
};
+static int ref_excluded(struct rev_info *revs, const char *path)
+{
+ struct string_list_item *item;
+
+ if (!revs->ref_excludes)
+ return 0;
+ for_each_string_list_item(item, revs->ref_excludes) {
+ if (!fnmatch(item->string, path, 0))
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int handle_one_ref(const char *path, const unsigned char *sha1, int flag, void *cb_data)
{
struct all_refs_cb *cb = cb_data;
- struct object *object = get_reference(cb->all_revs, path, sha1,
- cb->all_flags);
+ struct object *object;
+
+ if (ref_excluded(cb->all_revs, path))
+ return 0;
+
+ object = get_reference(cb->all_revs, path, sha1, cb->all_flags);
add_rev_cmdline(cb->all_revs, object, path, REV_CMD_REF, cb->all_flags);
add_pending_sha1(cb->all_revs, path, sha1, cb->all_flags);
return 0;
@@ -1197,6 +1214,24 @@ static void init_all_refs_cb(struct all_refs_cb *cb, struct rev_info *revs,
cb->all_flags = flags;
}
+static void clear_ref_exclusion(struct rev_info *revs)
+{
+ if (revs->ref_excludes) {
+ string_list_clear(revs->ref_excludes, 0);
+ free(revs->ref_excludes);
+ }
+ revs->ref_excludes = NULL;
+}
+
+static void add_ref_exclusion(struct rev_info *revs, const char *exclude)
+{
+ if (!revs->ref_excludes) {
+ revs->ref_excludes = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*revs->ref_excludes));
+ revs->ref_excludes->strdup_strings = 1;
+ }
+ string_list_append(revs->ref_excludes, exclude);
+}
+
static void handle_refs(const char *submodule, struct rev_info *revs, unsigned flags,
int (*for_each)(const char *, each_ref_fn, void *))
{
@@ -1953,33 +1988,44 @@ static int handle_revision_pseudo_opt(const char *submodule,
if (!strcmp(arg, "--all")) {
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags, for_each_ref_submodule);
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags, head_ref_submodule);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--branches")) {
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags, for_each_branch_ref_submodule);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--bisect")) {
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags, for_each_bad_bisect_ref);
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags ^ (UNINTERESTING | BOTTOM), for_each_good_bisect_ref);
revs->bisect = 1;
} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--tags")) {
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags, for_each_tag_ref_submodule);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--remotes")) {
handle_refs(submodule, revs, *flags, for_each_remote_ref_submodule);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if ((argcount = parse_long_opt("glob", argv, &optarg))) {
struct all_refs_cb cb;
init_all_refs_cb(&cb, revs, *flags);
for_each_glob_ref(handle_one_ref, optarg, &cb);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
+ return argcount;
+ } else if ((argcount = parse_long_opt("exclude", argv, &optarg))) {
+ add_ref_exclusion(revs, optarg);
return argcount;
} else if (!prefixcmp(arg, "--branches=")) {
struct all_refs_cb cb;
init_all_refs_cb(&cb, revs, *flags);
for_each_glob_ref_in(handle_one_ref, arg + 11, "refs/heads/", &cb);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if (!prefixcmp(arg, "--tags=")) {
struct all_refs_cb cb;
init_all_refs_cb(&cb, revs, *flags);
for_each_glob_ref_in(handle_one_ref, arg + 7, "refs/tags/", &cb);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if (!prefixcmp(arg, "--remotes=")) {
struct all_refs_cb cb;
init_all_refs_cb(&cb, revs, *flags);
for_each_glob_ref_in(handle_one_ref, arg + 10, "refs/remotes/", &cb);
+ clear_ref_exclusion(revs);
} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--reflog")) {
handle_reflog(revs, *flags);
} else if (!strcmp(arg, "--not")) {
diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
index 95859ba..b4dc56c 100644
--- a/revision.h
+++ b/revision.h
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ struct rev_info {
/* The end-points specified by the end user */
struct rev_cmdline_info cmdline;
+ /* excluding from --branches, --refs, etc. expansion */
+ struct string_list *ref_excludes;
+
/* Basic information */
const char *prefix;
const char *def;
--
1.8.4-358-g02cbb92
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-30 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-30 5:00 [PATCH] revision: add --except option Felipe Contreras
2013-08-30 5:40 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-30 6:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-30 7:17 ` Felipe Contreras
[not found] ` <CAPc5daVSqoE74kmsobg7RpMtiL3vzKN+ckAcWEKU_Q_wF8HYuA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-08-30 7:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-30 9:08 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-08-30 16:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-30 18:37 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-30 23:55 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-08-31 0:22 ` [PATCH] revision: introduce --exclude=<glob> to tame wildcards Duy Nguyen
2013-08-31 0:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-08-31 19:33 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03 15:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-03 22:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-02 20:11 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-09-02 23:09 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-03 4:05 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-09-03 16:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-03 20:02 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-11-01 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] ref glob exclusion follow-up Junio C Hamano
2013-11-01 19:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] rev-list --exclude: tests Junio C Hamano
2013-11-01 19:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] rev-list --exclude: export add/clear-ref-exclusion and ref-excluded API Junio C Hamano
2013-11-01 19:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] rev-parse: introduce --exclude=<glob> to tame wildcards Junio C Hamano
2013-11-01 19:43 ` Eric Sunshine
2013-11-01 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-11-01 21:08 ` [PATCH 0/5] ref glob exclusion follow-up Johannes Sixt
2013-08-30 7:56 ` [PATCH] revision: add --except option Johannes Sixt
2013-08-31 19:27 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-09-02 6:25 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-09-02 6:48 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-30 7:11 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-08-30 7:24 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq1u5aybri.fsf_-_@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox