public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: John Keeping <john@keeping•me.uk>,
	Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail•com>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail•com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger•kernel.org>,
	Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-compat-util: Avoid strcasecmp() being inlined
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:35:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqd2odq45y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130912182057.GB32069@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:20:57 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:37:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > I wonder if GCC has changed it's behaviour to more closely match C99.
>> > Clang as a compatibility article about this sort of issue:
>> >
>> >     http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.html#inline
>> 
>> Interesting.  The ways the page suggests as fixes are
>> 
>>  - change it to a "statis inline";
>>  - remove "inline" from the definition;
>>  - provide an external (non-inline) def somewhere else;
>>  - compile with gnu899 dialect.
>
> Right, option 3 seems perfectly reasonable to me, as we must be prepared
> to cope with a decision not to inline the function, and there has to be
> _some_ linked implementation. But shouldn't libc be providing an
> external, linkable strcasecmp in this case?

That is exactly my point when I said that the third one is nonsense
for a definition in the standard header file.

I think we would want something like below.

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] mailmap: work around implementations with pure inline strcasecmp

On some systems, string.h has _only_ inline definition of strcasecmp
without supplying a non-inline implementation anywhere, which is,
eh, "unusual"; we cannot take an address of such a function to store
it in namemap.cmp.  Work it around by introducing our own level of
indirection.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
---
 mailmap.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mailmap.c b/mailmap.c
index 44614fc..8863e23 100644
--- a/mailmap.c
+++ b/mailmap.c
@@ -52,6 +52,19 @@ static void free_mailmap_entry(void *p, const char *s)
 	string_list_clear_func(&me->namemap, free_mailmap_info);
 }
 
+/*
+ * On some systems, string.h has _only_ inline definition of strcasecmp
+ * without supplying a non-inline implementation anywhere, which is, eh,
+ * "unusual"; we cannot take an address of such a function to store it in
+ * namemap.cmp.  This is here as a workaround---do not assign strcasecmp
+ * directly to namemap.cmp until we know no systems that matter have such
+ * an "unusual" string.h.
+ */
+static int namemap_cmp(const char *a, const char *b)
+{
+	return strcasecmp(a, b);
+}
+
 static void add_mapping(struct string_list *map,
 			char *new_name, char *new_email,
 			char *old_name, char *old_email)
@@ -75,7 +88,7 @@ static void add_mapping(struct string_list *map,
 		item = string_list_insert_at_index(map, index, old_email);
 		me = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct mailmap_entry));
 		me->namemap.strdup_strings = 1;
-		me->namemap.cmp = strcasecmp;
+		me->namemap.cmp = namemap_cmp;
 		item->util = me;
 	}
 
@@ -241,7 +254,7 @@ int read_mailmap(struct string_list *map, char **repo_abbrev)
 	int err = 0;
 
 	map->strdup_strings = 1;
-	map->cmp = strcasecmp;
+	map->cmp = namemap_cmp;
 
 	if (!git_mailmap_blob && is_bare_repository())
 		git_mailmap_blob = "HEAD:.mailmap";
-- 
1.8.4-485-gec42fe2

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-12 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-11 16:06 [PATCH] git-compat-util: Avoid strcasecmp() being inlined Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-11 18:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-11 19:16   ` Jeff King
2013-09-19  6:04     ` Piotr Krukowiecki
     [not found]       ` <CAPc5daVt4Q9twub5KyOQqZHx9CwOnkuwA97sXV44fF2j1e5HVg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-19  9:47         ` Piotr Krukowiecki
2013-09-19 21:16           ` Jeff King
2013-09-19 22:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-19 22:05               ` Jeff King
2013-09-19 22:40                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-20  3:18                   ` Jeff King
2013-09-20  6:21             ` Piotr Krukowiecki
2013-09-24  5:32               ` Jeff King
2013-09-11 19:59   ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-11 21:41     ` Jeff King
2013-09-12  9:36       ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-12 10:14         ` John Keeping
2013-09-12 15:37           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-12 18:20             ` Jeff King
2013-09-12 18:35               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2013-09-12 18:38                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-12 19:51                   ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-12 20:08                     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-13 12:33                       ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-13 14:26                         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-13 19:34                           ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-12 21:36                     ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-12 19:00                 ` Jeff King
2013-09-12 19:46               ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-12 20:22                 ` Jeff King
2013-09-12 20:29                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-13 12:47                     ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-13 14:37                       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-13 19:53                         ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-13 19:56                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-13 20:03                             ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-13 20:01                           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-13 20:04                             ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-13 22:06                               ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-13 22:35                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-15 12:44                                 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-17 16:17                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-17 19:16                                     ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-17 21:46                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-09-18  9:43                                         ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-18 12:19                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-12 21:31                 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-09-19 13:47                   ` Sebastian Schuberth
2013-09-11 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqd2odq45y.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=john@keeping$(echo .)me.uk \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=karsten.blees@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    --cc=sschuberth@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox