public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn•nl>, git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] remote: add new --fetch option for set-url
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:18:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqsiherirj.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq1toysyak.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:58:11 -0800")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com> writes:

> Jeff King <peff@peff•net> writes:
>
>> But here you do not have a pushurl defined in the first place. So I
>> guess this is really just a shortcut for swapping the two, like:
>>
>>   git remote set-url --push gh $(git config remote.gh.url)
>>   git remote set-url gh new-fetch-url
>
> It seems that this swapping is only necessary because the repository
> is set up in this way:
>
>     $ browser github.com
>     ... fork upstream to your own publishing repository ...
>     $ git clone <your publish repo>
>     ... oops, I am set up to fetch from myself ...
>     $ git remote set-url --push mine <url for your publish repo>
>     $ git remote set-url <url for your upstream repo>
>
> If you are fetching from somebody else and then pushing into your
> own publishing repository (i.e. fork of that upstream), why isn't
> the sequence of event like this, instead?
>
>     $ git clone $upstream
>     $ browser github.com
>     ... fork upstream to your own publishing repository ...
>     $ git remote set-url --push mine <url for your publish repo>
>
> Isn't this one of those bad workflows encouraged by GitHub, for
> which you guys have to be punished ;-)?

I re-read the original and Peter is really accessing the same
repository, only over different transports.  Cloning via ssh:// but
later deciding to push via ssh:// but to fetch via https:// (or vice
versa; the important point is that clone was done over a transport
that is "wrong" for future fetching).

Of course, if you cloned via a wrong transport that is not suitable
for whatever reason for later fetching, you would need to have a way
to "swap", so the observation I made in the message I am following
up on does not apply to this thread at all.  Please scratch all of
the above.

Coming back to the topic, how common would this "oops, I cloned via
a wrong transport" be?  I am not opposed to giving a recovery method
for gotcha that does not happen very often, but if such an addition
adds undue confusion factor for people who use "set-url" for more
common cases, that would be a bad trade-off.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-19 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-19 15:18 [RFC] [PATCH] remote: add new --fetch option for set-url Peter Wu
2014-11-19 19:08 ` Jeff King
2014-11-19 19:42   ` Peter Wu
2014-11-19 20:17     ` Jeff King
2014-11-19 20:48       ` Peter Wu
2014-11-19 20:29   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-11-19 20:52     ` Peter Wu
2014-11-19 21:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2014-11-19 20:58   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-11-19 21:18     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2014-11-19 21:28       ` Peter Wu
2014-11-24 21:45         ` Peter Wu
2014-11-24 22:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2014-11-24 22:16             ` Peter Wu
2014-11-24 22:22               ` Jeff King
2014-11-24 22:47                 ` Peter Wu
2014-11-24 22:54                   ` Jeff King
2014-11-24 23:05                     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-11-24 23:27                     ` Peter Wu
2014-11-25  4:08                       ` Jeff King
2014-11-25  4:55                         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-11-25  5:01                           ` Jeff King
     [not found]                             ` <CAPc5daWh4hnKsTMpaW-TvCmVDfU+rzCezrAHcLgXDG6RVvzXHA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-25 11:43                               ` Peter Wu
2014-11-25 11:36                         ` Peter Wu
2014-11-29 13:31                       ` Philip Oakley
2014-12-02 17:45                         ` Peter Wu
2014-12-02 23:50                           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqsiherirj.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    --cc=peter@lekensteyn$(echo .)nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox