public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco•com>
Cc: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz•ch>,
	Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag•fr>,
	Git List <git@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] stripspace: Implement --count-lines option
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:18:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqwpukayde.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cQ=8FO8yFY4sHUwr0mYuyvMu4d-eizHZeadE9f0BgpXpQ@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Sunshine's message of "Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:57:57 -0400")

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco•com> writes:

> Is there any application beyond git-rebase--interactive where a
> --count-lines options is expected to be useful? It's not obvious from
> the commit message that this change is necessarily a win for later
> porting of git-rebase--interactive to C since the amount of extra code
> and support material added by this patch probably outweighs the amount
> of code a C version of git-rebase--interactive would need to count the
> lines itself.
>
> Stated differently, are the two or three instances of piping through
> 'wc' in git-rebase--interactive sufficient justification for
> introducing extra complexity into git-stripspace and its documentation
> and tests?

Interesting thought.  When somebody rewrites "rebase -i" in C,
nobody needs to count lines in "stripspace" output.  The rewritten
"rebase -i" would internally run strbuf_stripspace() and the question
becomes what is the best way to let that code find out how many lines
the result contains.

When viewed from that angle, I agree that "stripspace --count" does
not add anything to further the goal of helping "rebase -i" to move
to C.  Adding strbuf_count_lines() that counts the number of lines
in the given strbuf (if there is no such helper yet; I didn't check),
though.

>> +test_expect_success '--count-lines with newline only' '
>> +       printf "0\n" >expect &&
>> +       printf "\n" | git stripspace --count-lines >actual &&
>> +       test_cmp expect actual
>> +'
>
> What is the expected behavior when the input is an empty file, a file
> with content but no newline, a file with one or more lines but lacking
> a newline on the final line? Should these cases be tested, as well?

Good point here, too.  If we were to add strbuf_count_lines()
helper, whoever adds that function needs to take a possible
incomplete line at the end into account.

Thanks for your comments.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-18 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-16 15:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] stripspace: Implement and use --count-lines option Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] strbuf: make stripspace() part of strbuf Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] stripspace: Use parse-options for command-line parsing Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 17:07   ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-16 17:29     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-17 10:31       ` Tobias Klauser
2015-10-17 21:24         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-20  8:48           ` Tobias Klauser
2015-10-20 15:47             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-17 10:30     ` Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] stripspace: Implement --count-lines option Tobias Klauser
2015-10-17 23:57   ` Eric Sunshine
2015-10-18 17:18     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-10-19 13:46       ` Tobias Klauser
2015-10-19 17:03         ` Christian Couder
2015-10-19 19:24           ` Eric Sunshine
2015-10-19 19:42             ` Matthieu Moy
2015-10-19 13:31     ` Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] git rebase -i: Use newly added --count-lines option for stripspace Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] stripspace: Implement and use --count-lines option Junio C Hamano
2015-10-17 10:27   ` Tobias Klauser
2015-10-16 16:54 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-10-17 10:28   ` Tobias Klauser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqwpukayde.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@imag$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tklauser@distanz$(echo .)ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox