From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
To: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, David.Taylor@dell•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] worktree add: add --lock option
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 15:50:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy3v3orc3.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412135805.29837-1-pclouds@gmail.com> ("Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy"'s message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2017 20:58:05 +0700")
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail•com> writes:
> As explained in the document. This option has an advantage over the
> command sequence "git worktree add && git worktree lock": there will be
> no gap that somebody can accidentally "prune" the new worktree (or soon,
> explicitly "worktree remove" it).
>
> "worktree add" does keep a lock on while it's preparing the worktree.
> If --lock is specified, this lock remains after the worktree is created.
>
> Suggested-by: David Taylor <David.Taylor@dell•com>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail•com>
> ---
> A patch that adds --lock may look like this.
This looks more like "I do believe the idea by David is a useful
addition and here is how I did it to the best of my ability---let's
make sure we polish it for eventual inclusion" than a mere "it may
look like so---do whatever you want with it" patch.
To me "git worktree add --lock" somehow sounds less correct than
"git worktree add --locked", but I'd appreciate if natives can
correct me.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-13 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 15:14 git work trees taylor, david
2017-04-12 13:36 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-12 13:58 ` [PATCH] worktree add: add --lock option Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-13 22:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2017-04-14 13:00 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-24 14:06 ` taylor, david
2017-04-14 16:27 ` Jacob Keller
2017-04-15 7:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-15 8:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-15 11:34 ` Duy Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy3v3orc3.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=David.Taylor@dell$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox