From: broonie@opensource•wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clkdev: Implement managed clk_get()
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 18:16:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120402171641.GF15197@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F79D85F.4020909@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:48:31AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I hope we get a better clk_get() implementation with the unified struct
> clk. Don't get me wrong, clkdev is a great improvement over open coding
> clock framework stuff in each platform. But clkdev is really just
> another platform specific implementation that most platforms decide to
> use. Each platform has to select the option and it breaks if two
> Sticking devm_clk_get() into clkdev.c is simple, no new file, smaller
> diff. Great. But linking it to clkdev doesn't sound much better when
> we're trying to get rid of platform specific code and this code is
> entirely platform independent.
Why wouldn't we want to continue to use clkdev with the generic clock
framework? There's nothing particularly wrong with clkdev and we need a
standard mechanism for doing this anyway. Frankly I was very surprised
when I looked just now and realised that the generic framework doesn't
use it automatically, I might just send a patch for that...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120402/4c2b6896/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-01 11:32 [PATCH 1/2] clk: Fix comment for end of CONFIG_COMMON_CLK section Mark Brown
2012-04-01 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] clkdev: Implement managed clk_get() Mark Brown
2012-04-01 15:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-04-01 15:34 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-02 16:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-04-02 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 17:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-04-02 17:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 17:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-04-02 17:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 17:34 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-04-02 18:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 17:16 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-04-02 17:30 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-02 17:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 17:34 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-02 18:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-01 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: Fix comment for end of CONFIG_COMMON_CLK section Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-01 14:29 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120402171641.GF15197@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource$(echo .)wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox