From: plagnioj@jcrosoft•com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:21:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121222172133.GT23971@game.jcrosoft.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D426C1.5050807@free-electrons.com>
On 10:07 Fri 21 Dec , Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Le 20/12/2012 17:13, ludovic.desroches a ?crit :
> > On 12/20/2012 04:51 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> Hi Ludovic,
> >>
> >> Le 20/12/2012 11:52, ludovic.desroches a ?crit :
> >>>> I'm wondering, why are you using such a complex dt parsing code, and
> >>>> bindings, when you only requires a boolean to switch between 8 and 10
> >>>> bits mode (which seem to be the only thing you support)?
> >>>
> >>> We will have a 10 and 12 bits mode on future ADCs and I would like to
> >>> have something which could manage more than two resolutions if it
> >>> happens one day.
> >>
> >> I see your point. I'm not fond at all of the existing bindings for the
> >> driver (putting things like registers offset in the dt is a non-sense to
> >> me, but hey...), so I'd like to still keep it as simple and non-bloated
> >> as possible, but it's true that in the current situation, we probably
> >> have no other choice.
> >>
> >
> > I have the same feeling than you about ADC bindings, I think that there
> > are too many parameters exhibited. Moreover, most of them are chip
> > relative.
> >
> > I have not found other ways to deal with it properly. I would like to
> > have them hidden into the driver (depending on the compatible string)
> > but it will be a mess if we split parameters into dt and driver.
>
> I'm glad we feel the same way :)
I'm not I fee; exactly this opposte way
I do want to toucht the kernel code to add new soc
so no I like this binding
Best Regards,
J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-22 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 18:32 [PATCH 0/3] IIO: AT91: add lowres, sleep and sample&hold time missing support Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-19 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add sleep mode support Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-20 10:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-27 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2012-12-27 17:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-19 18:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: fix missing Sample and Hold time Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-20 10:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 12:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-12-21 9:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: AT91: IIO: add low and high res support for adc Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:52 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-12-20 15:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 16:13 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-12-21 9:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-22 17:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [this message]
2013-01-07 9:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] IIO: AT91: add lowres, sleep and sample&hold time missing support Maxime Ripard
2012-12-20 10:51 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-12-27 12:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121222172133.GT23971@game.jcrosoft.org \
--to=plagnioj@jcrosoft$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox