public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm•com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: spin-table: handle unmapped cpu-release-addrs
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 15:38:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140815143804.GW27466@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408113355.599.146.camel@deneb.redhat.com>

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 03:35:55PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 15:28 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 15 August 2014 14:53, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm•com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >> On 15 August 2014 13:57, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm•com> wrote:
> > >> > I was planning to take all of these for 3.18 as there's no regression here
> > >> > (the fuzzing is a new debug feature and defaults to `n'). Do you think these
> > >> > qualify as -rc1 material?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Considering that TEXT_OFFSET fuzzing is recommended to be turned on
> > >> for distro kernels, I would say this is definitely appropriate for
> > >> 3.17
> > >
> > > Whilst I see that in the commit log, the same recommendation doesn't appear
> > > in the Kconfig text and I'm not sure that it's such a wise thing to say
> > > either. From a distribution's point of view, I think I'd want any kernel
> > > issues to be as reproducible as possible, and fuzzing the text offset seems
> > > to go against that.
> > >
> > 
> > OK. There is one other real world issue that 3/3 addresses, which are
> > platforms that have memreserves at the base of DRAM containing bits of
> > UEFI itself (this is what got this whole discussion going in the first
> > place). Currently, we cannot boot via UEFI on these platforms, as the
> > EFI stub will only consider base of DRAM + TEXT_OFFSET as an option,
> > and fail the boot if it is not available.
> > 
> > If this is something that could wait until 3.18 as well (Mark S?),
> > then it's fine by me.
> > 
> 
> I don't see a problem with waiting until 3.18.

Cheers, I've applied the series to our for-next branch and I'll push
everything out at -rc1.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-15 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAKv+Gu_UjRNhhiM0GPsKRdXRtmEnY6cbpY-JZ33RUMapbPYsbQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-13 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: spin-table: handle unmapped cpu-release-addrs Mark Rutland
2014-08-14 17:13   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-14 18:10     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-08-15 11:57       ` Will Deacon
2014-08-15 12:07         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-08-15 12:53           ` Will Deacon
2014-08-15 13:28             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-08-15 14:35               ` Mark Salter
2014-08-15 14:38                 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-08-17  0:06                   ` Leif Lindholm
2014-08-18 16:47                     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-18 17:22                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 10:59 [PATCH 0/3 v2] arm64/efi: improve TEXT_OFFSET handling Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: spin-table: handle unmapped cpu-release-addrs Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 11:30   ` Will Deacon
2014-07-30 12:00     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 12:05       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 12:30       ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-30 12:42         ` Will Deacon
2014-07-30 12:49           ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-30 13:10             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 13:28               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-30 19:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-31  9:45       ` Will Deacon
2014-07-31  9:58         ` Mark Rutland
2014-07-31 10:04           ` Will Deacon
2014-07-31 10:16             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-31 10:39             ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-01 11:35               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-31 14:41             ` Mark Salter
2014-07-31 10:01         ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140815143804.GW27466@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox