From: olof@lixom•net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:13:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150127021344.GA22154@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C660FE.3000401@atmel.com>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
> >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
> >>>> options may be removed in the near future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel•com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Olof,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
> >>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
> >>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
> >>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
> >>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
> >>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
> >>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
> >> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
> >> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
> >> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.
> >>
> >> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
> >> per SoC.
> >
> > With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes
> > one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig
> > options.
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt
> was okay? Aka: ping ;-)
Ah, yes. Applied now.
-Olof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-27 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 6:20 [PATCH V2] ARM: dts: Only build dtb if associated Arch and/or SoC is enabled Peter Robinson
2015-01-12 22:42 ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-13 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-13 18:07 ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-13 14:43 ` [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 23:09 ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-13 23:47 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-14 9:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-26 15:45 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-27 2:13 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150127021344.GA22154@quad.lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom$(echo .)net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox