public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail•com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation•org
Cc: linux-arch@vger•kernel.org, amit.kucheria@verdurent•com,
	arnd@arndb•de, yamada.masahiro@socionext•com,
	linus.walleij@linaro•org, daniel.lezcano@linaro•org,
	michal.simek@xilinx•com, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	bgolaszewski@baylibre•com, rrichter@marvell•com,
	linux-gpio@vger•kernel.org, linux-pm@vger•kernel.org,
	rui.zhang@intel•com, andriy.shevchenko@linux•intel.com,
	Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail•com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:50:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424135011.GA3255@icarus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424122407.GA5523@syed>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 05:54:07PM +0530, Syed Nayyar Waris wrote:
> This patchset introduces a new generic version of for_each_set_clump. 
> The previous version of for_each_set_clump8 used a fixed size 8-bit
> clump, but the new generic version can work with clump of any size but
> less than or equal to BITS_PER_LONG. The patchset utilizes the new macro 
> in several GPIO drivers.

Regarding the nomenclature, I created the term "clump" to represent an
8-bit value that was not necessarily a byte yet was a contiguous
grouping of bits. With this patchset, we now have a more generic
for_each_set_clump macro that can handle values larger and smaller than
8-bits.

Would it make sense to retire the term "clump" and instead use "nbits"
where applicable, in order to match the existing convention used by the
bitmap functions; for instance, would it be better to name this macro
for_each_set_nbits?

William Breathitt Gray

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-24 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 12:24 [PATCH 0/6] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-04-24 13:50 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2020-04-24 16:28 ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200424135011.GA3255@icarus \
    --to=vilhelm.gray@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre$(echo .)com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx$(echo .)com \
    --cc=rrichter@marvell$(echo .)com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=syednwaris@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox