[PATCHv2 6/7] Input: Add "inhibited" property

From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora•com>
To: linux-input@vger•kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-iio@vger•kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger•kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger•kernel.org,
	patches@opensource•cirrus.com,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists•sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Nick Dyer <nick@shmanahar•org>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia•com>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw•net>,
	kernel@collabora•com, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail•com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo•de>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel•org>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia•com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel•org>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp•com>,
	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@gmail•com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel•org>,
	Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog•com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix•de>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@hmh•eng.br>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia•com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat•com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel•org>, Ferruh Yigit <fery@cypress•com>,
	Patrik Fimml <patrikf@chromium•org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail•com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki•net>,
	Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora•com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail•com>,
	Sangwon Jee <jeesw@melfas•com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix•de>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx•de>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel•org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel•org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 6/7] Input: Add "inhibited" property
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 18:52:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515165237.28906-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200515164943.28480-1-andrzej.p@collabora.com>

From: Patrik Fimml <patrikf@chromium•org>

Userspace might want to implement a policy to temporarily disregard input
from certain devices, including not treating them as wakeup sources.

An example use case is a laptop, whose keyboard can be folded under the
screen to create tablet-like experience. The user then must hold the laptop
in such a way that it is difficult to avoid pressing the keyboard keys. It
is therefore desirable to temporarily disregard input from the keyboard,
until it is folded back. This obviously is a policy which should be kept
out of the kernel, but the kernel must provide suitable means to implement
such a policy.

This patch adds a sysfs interface for exactly this purpose.

To implement the said interface it adds an "inhibited" property to struct
input_dev and two optional methods - inhibit() and uninhibit(), and
effectively creates four states a device can be in: closed uninhibited,
closed inhibited, open uninhibited, open inhibited. It also defers calling
driver's ->open() and ->close() to until they are actually needed, e.g. it
makes no sense to prepare the underlying device for generating events
(->open()) if the device is inhibited.

              uninhibit
closed      <------------ closed
uninhibited ------------> inhibited
      | ^     inhibit        | ^
 1st  | |               1st  | |
 open | |               open | |
      | |                    | |
      | | last               | | last
      | | close              | | close
      v |     uninhibit      v |
open        <------------ open
uninhibited ------------> inhibited

The top inhibit/uninhibit transition happens when users == 0.
The bottom inhibit/uninhibit transition happens when users > 0.
The left open/close transition happens when !inhibited.
The right open/close transition happens when inhibited.
Due to all transitions being serialized with dev->mutex, it is impossible
to have "diagonal" transitions between closed uninhibited and open
inhibited or between open uninhibited and closed inhibited.

open() and close() - if provided - are called in both inhibit and uninhibit
paths. Please note that close() does not return a value, so if your driver
might need failing inhibiting, you need to provide inhibit() so that it
returns a value to check.

It is drivers' responsibility to implement their inhibiting capability in
terms of whatever is suitable in their context, be it open/close,
inhibit/uninhibit or a combination of both. The drivers should also ensure
that they properly interact with suspend/resume and PM runtime, because
most likely a side effect of inhibiting a device should be its going into
low power mode. Properly inhibiting a device means to prevent it from being
a wakeup source, so drivers should also take care of that.

Signed-off-by: Patrik Fimml <patrikf@chromium•org>
Co-developed-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora•com>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora•com>
---
 drivers/input/input.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/input.h |   8 +++
 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
index 41377bfa142d..5b859a178c11 100644
--- a/drivers/input/input.c
+++ b/drivers/input/input.c
@@ -367,8 +367,13 @@ static int input_get_disposition(struct input_dev *dev,
 static void input_handle_event(struct input_dev *dev,
 			       unsigned int type, unsigned int code, int value)
 {
-	int disposition = input_get_disposition(dev, type, code, &value);
+	int disposition;
 
+	/* filter-out events from inhibited devices */
+	if (dev->inhibited)
+		return;
+
+	disposition = input_get_disposition(dev, type, code, &value);
 	if (disposition != INPUT_IGNORE_EVENT && type != EV_SYN)
 		add_input_randomness(type, code, value);
 
@@ -612,7 +617,7 @@ int input_open_device(struct input_handle *handle)
 
 	handle->open++;
 
-	if (dev->users++) {
+	if (dev->users++ || dev->inhibited) {
 		/*
 		 * Device is already opened, so we can exit immediately and
 		 * report success.
@@ -660,6 +665,14 @@ int input_flush_device(struct input_handle *handle, struct file *file)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(input_flush_device);
 
+static inline void input_stop(struct input_dev *dev)
+{
+	if (dev->poller)
+		input_dev_poller_stop(dev->poller);
+	if (dev->close)
+		dev->close(dev);
+}
+
 /**
  * input_close_device - close input device
  * @handle: handle through which device is being accessed
@@ -675,13 +688,8 @@ void input_close_device(struct input_handle *handle)
 
 	__input_release_device(handle);
 
-	if (!--dev->users) {
-		if (dev->poller)
-			input_dev_poller_stop(dev->poller);
-
-		if (dev->close)
-			dev->close(dev);
-	}
+	if (!dev->inhibited && !--dev->users)
+		input_stop(dev);
 
 	if (!--handle->open) {
 		/*
@@ -1416,12 +1424,49 @@ static ssize_t input_dev_show_properties(struct device *dev,
 }
 static DEVICE_ATTR(properties, S_IRUGO, input_dev_show_properties, NULL);
 
+static int input_inhibit(struct input_dev *dev);
+static int input_uninhibit(struct input_dev *dev);
+
+static ssize_t inhibited_show(struct device *dev,
+			      struct device_attribute *attr,
+			      char *buf)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input_dev = to_input_dev(dev);
+
+	return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", input_dev->inhibited);
+}
+
+static ssize_t inhibited_store(struct device *dev,
+			       struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
+			       size_t len)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input_dev = to_input_dev(dev);
+	ssize_t rv;
+	bool inhibited;
+
+	if (strtobool(buf, &inhibited))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (inhibited)
+		rv = input_inhibit(input_dev);
+	else
+		rv = input_uninhibit(input_dev);
+
+	if (rv != 0)
+		return rv;
+
+	return len;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(inhibited);
+
 static struct attribute *input_dev_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_name.attr,
 	&dev_attr_phys.attr,
 	&dev_attr_uniq.attr,
 	&dev_attr_modalias.attr,
 	&dev_attr_properties.attr,
+	&dev_attr_inhibited.attr,
 	NULL
 };
 
@@ -1703,6 +1748,77 @@ void input_reset_device(struct input_dev *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(input_reset_device);
 
+static int input_inhibit(struct input_dev *dev)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+
+	if (dev->inhibited)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (dev->users) {
+		if (dev->inhibit) {
+			ret = dev->inhibit(dev);
+			if (ret)
+				goto out;
+		}
+		input_stop(dev);
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
+	input_dev_release_keys(dev);
+	input_dev_toggle(dev, false);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
+
+	dev->inhibited = true;
+
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int input_uninhibit(struct input_dev *dev)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+
+	if (!dev->inhibited)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (dev->users) {
+		if (dev->open) {
+			ret = dev->open(dev);
+			if (ret)
+				goto toggle;
+		}
+		if (dev->uninhibit) {
+			ret = dev->uninhibit(dev);
+			if (ret) {
+				if (dev->close)
+					dev->close(dev);
+				goto toggle;
+			}
+		}
+		if (dev->poller)
+			input_dev_poller_start(dev->poller);
+	}
+
+	dev->inhibited = false;
+
+toggle:
+	if (!dev->inhibited) {
+		spin_lock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
+		input_dev_toggle(dev, true);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&dev->event_lock);
+	}
+
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int input_dev_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -2131,7 +2247,7 @@ bool input_device_enabled(struct input_dev *dev)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&dev->mutex);
 
-	return dev->users > 0;
+	return !dev->inhibited && dev->users > 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(input_device_enabled);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/input.h b/include/linux/input.h
index eda4587dba67..8d0dcfaeaf6f 100644
--- a/include/linux/input.h
+++ b/include/linux/input.h
@@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ enum input_clock_type {
  *	and needs not be explicitly unregistered or freed.
  * @timestamp: storage for a timestamp set by input_set_timestamp called
  *  by a driver
+ * @inhibit: makes the device ignore all input
+ * @uninhibit: undoes the effect of inhibit
+ * @inhibited: indicates that the input device is inhibited
  */
 struct input_dev {
 	const char *name;
@@ -201,6 +204,11 @@ struct input_dev {
 	bool devres_managed;
 
 	ktime_t timestamp[INPUT_CLK_MAX];
+
+	int (*inhibit)(struct input_dev *dev);
+	int (*uninhibit)(struct input_dev *dev);
+
+	bool inhibited;
 };
 #define to_input_dev(d) container_of(d, struct input_dev, dev)
 
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
