public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: timur@freescale•com (Timur Tabi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: vexpress: initial device tree support
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:28:44 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0CD7BC.7080409@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F0CBD46.2010909@firmworks.com>

Mitch Bradley wrote:
> It seems to me that having the framebuffer driver handle the EDID 
> "driver" function is exactly the right thing.  The framebuffer driver is 
> the only thing that cares about EDID information.  Given a phandle 
> reference to an I2C interface, the "driver" is just "call the I2C read 
> routine" - plus, in your case, toggling the GPIO pin.

Do you think I should have the I2C probe function read the EDID data, and then store it in some global variable?  That won't work if I have multiple video controllers, since I won't know which EDID data goes with which video controller.  I tried adding a call to i2c_add_driver() in my framebuffer driver, but the I2C probe function was called *after* the framebuffer's probe function, so that doesn't help me.  

> That GPIO pin thing is annoying, but not sufficiently complex or common 
> that it warrants having a separate EDID driver.  You could define a 
> platform-specific property to tell your framebuffer driver that it needs 
> to do that GPIO thing.  It's a hack, but the GPIO thing is inherently a 
> hack, so there will be some ugliness somewhere as a result.

I have two platform-specific functions, "enabled_edid" and "disable_edid", that I call before/after calling fb_ddc_read().  This seems to work well, and I already have a mechanism for calling platform-specific functions from the framebuffer driver.

However, Stephen Warren said I should be using the I2C mux feature instead.  

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-11  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21  9:19 [PATCH] ARM: vexpress: initial device tree support Dave Martin
2011-09-21 13:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 14:24   ` Dave Martin
2011-09-21 14:33     ` Pawel Moll
2011-09-21 15:49       ` Dave Martin
2011-09-21 14:57   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 16:01     ` Pawel Moll
2011-09-21 16:17       ` Dave Martin
2011-09-21 16:28         ` Pawel Moll
2011-09-21 16:37     ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 17:15       ` Dave Martin
2011-09-21 17:47         ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-22 12:19           ` Dave Martin
2012-01-09 23:26 ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-01-10  0:42   ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-10  2:24     ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-01-10 12:22     ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-10 21:58       ` Timur Tabi
2012-01-10 22:35         ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-10 23:55           ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-11  0:02             ` Timur Tabi
2012-01-11  0:28           ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2012-01-11  6:43             ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-11 20:17               ` Timur Tabi
2012-01-11 23:20                 ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-11 23:32                   ` Timur Tabi
2012-01-11 20:29               ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-11 20:32                 ` Timur Tabi
2012-01-11 20:36                   ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-11 21:37                     ` Timur Tabi
2012-01-11 21:57                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-12 12:24                     ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 16:49                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-11 23:16                 ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-12  0:15                   ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-12  0:38                     ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-12  0:47                       ` Mitch Bradley
2012-01-12 16:45                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-12 12:09                     ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-12 16:52                       ` Stephen Warren
2012-01-10 11:04   ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F0CD7BC.7080409@freescale.com \
    --to=timur@freescale$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox