public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro•org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 variants
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:16:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F88434C.9010709@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334329500.27644.18.camel@hornet>

On 13/04/12 16:05, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 15:54 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 13/04/12 15:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Friday 13 April 2012, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 15:05 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>> +     of_property_read_u32(np, "wp-gpios",&pdata->gpio_wp);
>>>>> +     if (!pdata->gpio_wp)
>>>>> +             pdata->gpio_wp = -1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     of_property_read_u32(np, "cd-gpios",&pdata->gpio_cd);
>>>>> +     if (!pdata->gpio_cd)
>>>>> +             pdata->gpio_cd = -1;
>>>>
>>>> I think you should use of_gpio_named_count(np, "XX-gpios") here rather
>>>> then of_property_read() - there's more to GPIOs than just a number...
>
> Of course I meant of_get_named_gpio(np, "XX-gpios", 0) not
> _named_count ;-)
>
>>> Hmm, that part was done right in the git tree, I guess something
>>> went wrong when sending out the series.
>>
>> Different patch series.
>>
>> The GPIO bindings aren't in yet. Once this one is accepted, I'll fire
>> off the second patch-set.
>
> Em, I'm not sure I'm following... Why not use the proper API
> immediately?
>
> Generally, except for that, looks good to me.

Because in it's current state, gpio-nomadik doesn't know how to decode 
any provided flags and phandles don't work yet, hence the IRQ request 
really is just a number in this case. In a latter patch-set I provide 
the GPIO driver with said bindings and swap the simple integer format 
for one which is more in keeping with the DT format e.g. <32> becomes 
<&gpio1 1 0x4> for instance.

This patch does function perfectly well the way it is and provides no 
breakage. I'm aiming for both patch-sets to be sucked into the v3.5 
merge window in any case, so all functionality will be provided at -rc1. 
Only the bleeding edge, hardcore, kernel developers who use the 
gpio-nomadik driver (so, just me and Linus Walleij then :D ) will ever 
use this code as-is.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-13 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 14:05 [PATCH 0/7 v2] Next round of DT enablement for ux500/Snowball Lee Jones
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: ux500: Rename the DT compatible entry for i2c devices on Snowball Lee Jones
2012-04-16  8:34   ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: ux500: Shorten Snowball's DT compatible gpio entry Lee Jones
2012-04-16  8:36   ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16  9:00     ` Lee Jones
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 3/7] drivers/gpio: gpio-nomadik: Apply Device Tree bindings Lee Jones
2012-04-16  8:40   ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-17 21:33   ` Grant Likely
2012-05-18  7:37     ` Lee Jones
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 4/7] drivers/gpio: gpio-nomadik: Provide documentation for " Lee Jones
2012-04-13 14:59   ` Lee Jones
2012-04-16  8:43     ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: ux500: Rename gpio_keys in the Device Tree file Lee Jones
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 variants Lee Jones
2012-04-13 14:42   ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-13 14:51     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-13 14:54       ` Lee Jones
2012-04-13 15:05         ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-13 15:16           ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-04-13 15:27             ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-16  8:48   ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16  9:06     ` Lee Jones
2012-04-16  9:18       ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-16  9:25     ` [PATCH 6.1/7] ARM: ux500: Enable Device Tree support mmci for Snowball Lee Jones
2012-04-16  9:26     ` [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 Lee Jones
2012-04-25 18:57       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-30  8:25         ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 15:03         ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 15:12           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-03 15:18             ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 15:30             ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 16:30               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-03 16:38                 ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 16:45                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-03 16:59                     ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 17:13                       ` Mark Brown
2012-05-03 21:21                         ` Lee Jones
2012-05-03 17:09                     ` Chris Ball
2012-05-04 13:18                       ` Lee Jones
2012-05-04 13:26                         ` Chris Ball
2012-05-04 13:39                           ` Lee Jones
2012-05-07 22:00                             ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-05-08 11:19                               ` Lee Jones
2012-05-08 12:18                                 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-08 12:59                                   ` Lee Jones
2012-05-08 14:38                                     ` Chris Ball
2012-05-08 23:58                                     ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-05-09  0:29                                       ` Chris Ball
2012-05-09  0:52                                         ` Paul Gortmaker
2012-06-04 10:14       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-05 10:47         ` Lee Jones
2012-06-05 10:52           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-05 12:59             ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-06  8:09               ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 10:03               ` Lee Jones
2012-06-11 10:34                 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] MMC: mmci: Add required documentation for Device Tree bindings Lee Jones
2012-04-18 14:31   ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-18 15:01     ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-18 15:12     ` Lee Jones
2012-04-18 15:20       ` Chris Ball
2012-04-18 15:25         ` Lee Jones
2012-04-18 15:20   ` [PATCH 7/7 v2] " Lee Jones
2012-05-17 21:23   ` [PATCH 7/7] " Grant Likely
2012-04-13 14:21 ` [PATCH 0/7 v2] Next round of DT enablement for ux500/Snowball Arnd Bergmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-05 10:25 [PATCH 1/7] ARM: ux500: New DT:ed snowball_platform_devs for one-by-one device enablement Lee Jones
2012-04-05 10:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 variants Lee Jones
2012-04-05  9:55 [0/7] Next round of DT enablement for ux500/Snowball Lee Jones
2012-04-05  9:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500 variants Lee Jones
2012-04-05 12:36   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-05 13:45     ` Lee Jones
2012-04-06  4:14       ` Grant Likely
2012-04-09 14:27         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-09 14:41           ` Chris Ball

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F88434C.9010709@linaro.org \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox