From: rnayak@ti•com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] ARM: OMAP3: update cpuidle latency and threshold figures
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:31:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE1AD8B.305@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339686361-11526-8-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
On Thursday 14 June 2012 08:35 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> {
> .enter = omap3_enter_idle_bm,
> - .exit_latency = 3000 + 8500,
> - .target_residency = 15000,
> + .exit_latency = 4080 + 801,
> + .target_residency = 215000,
> .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> .name = "C6",
> .desc = "MPU OFF + CORE RET",
> },
> {
> .enter = omap3_enter_idle_bm,
> - .exit_latency = 10000 + 30000,
> - .target_residency = 30000,
> + .exit_latency = 4300 + 13000,
> + .target_residency = 215000,
Is the target_residency same for both these states?
> .flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> .name = "C7",
> .desc = "MPU OFF + CORE OFF",
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 15:05 [PATCH v8 00/10] PM QoS: implement the OMAP low level constraints management code Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 01/10] ARM: OMAP2+: PM QoS: control the power domains next state from the constraints Jean Pihet
2012-06-15 11:37 ` Jean Pihet
2012-07-19 9:12 ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-07-20 3:08 ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 02/10] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 03/10] ARM: OMAP2+: PM QoS: manage the per-device latency constraints in hwmod Jean Pihet
2012-06-20 10:29 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-20 11:38 ` Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: OMAP: omap_device: register to the per-device PM QoS framework Jean Pihet
2012-06-20 10:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-19 9:21 ` Menon, Nishanth
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 05/10] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle: next C-state decision depends on the PM QoS MPU and CORE constraints Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 06/10] ARM: OMAP3: PM: cpuidle: default to C1 in next_valid_state Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 07/10] ARM: OMAP3: update cpuidle latency and threshold figures Jean Pihet
2012-06-20 11:01 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-06-20 11:39 ` Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:05 ` [PATCH 08/10] ARM: OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] ARM: OMAP: convert I2C driver to PM QoS for latency constraints Jean Pihet
2012-06-14 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: OMAP: PM: remove the latency related functions from the API Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE1AD8B.305@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox