From: santosh.shilimkar@ti•com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERLINE
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:51:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50880795.4030609@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349595838-31274-7-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The ARM platforms take advantage of packing small tasks on few cores.
> This is true even when the cores of a cluster can't be powergated
> independently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro•org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 26c12c6..00511d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ static inline void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpuid, unsigned int mpidr) {}
> */
> struct cputopo_arm cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>
> +int arch_sd_share_power_line(void)
> +{
> + return 0*SD_SHARE_POWERLINE;
> +}
Making this selection of policy based on sched domain will better. Just
gives the flexibility to choose a separate scheme for big and little
systems which will be very convenient.
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-07 7:43 [RFC 0/6] sched: packing small tasks Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07 7:43 ` [RFC 1/6] Revert "sched: introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07 7:43 ` [RFC 2/6] sched: add a new SD SHARE_POWERLINE flag for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 9:40 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-29 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 10:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-07 7:43 ` [RFC 3/6] sched: pack small tasks Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 10:53 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-09 16:46 ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-12 13:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-12 9:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-09 17:13 ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-12 13:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-20 14:28 ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-11-20 16:59 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07 7:43 ` [RFC 4/6] sched: secure access to other CPU statistics Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:21 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-10-07 7:43 ` [RFC 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:21 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-29 13:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 10:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-07 7:43 ` [RFC 6/6] ARM: sched: clear SD_SHARE_POWERLINE Vincent Guittot
2012-10-24 15:21 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-10-29 13:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-11-02 11:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-11-12 8:23 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50880795.4030609@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox