public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ARM: poison_init_mem: fixed underflow in loop
@ 2013-02-20 11:52 Enrico Scholz
  2013-02-20 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Enrico Scholz @ 2013-02-20 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

When initmemory ends at an odd address, the loop variable in
poison_init_mem() will underflow which causes overriding of valid
memory. Such situations are not a theoretical issue only but
exist in practice:

| [    0.000000]       .init : 0xc0634000 - 0xc0c215ab   (6070 kB)

Patch makes a simple division instead of DIV_ROUND_UP() because latter
can override some bytes after .init.

Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz•de>
---
 arch/arm/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index ad722f1..c431a2d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -449,7 +449,8 @@ static inline int free_area(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end, char *s)
 static inline void poison_init_mem(void *s, size_t count)
 {
 	u32 *p = (u32 *)s;
-	for (; count != 0; count -= 4)
+	count /= sizeof(*p);
+	for (; count != 0; count--)
 		*p++ = 0xe7fddef0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ARM: poison_init_mem: fixed underflow in loop
  2013-02-20 11:52 [PATCH] ARM: poison_init_mem: fixed underflow in loop Enrico Scholz
@ 2013-02-20 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2013-02-20 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 2/20/2013 3:52 AM, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> When initmemory ends at an odd address, the loop variable in
> poison_init_mem() will underflow which causes overriding of valid
> memory. Such situations are not a theoretical issue only but
> exist in practice:
>
> | [    0.000000]       .init : 0xc0634000 - 0xc0c215ab   (6070 kB)
>
> Patch makes a simple division instead of DIV_ROUND_UP() because latter
> can override some bytes after .init.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz•de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> index ad722f1..c431a2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
> @@ -449,7 +449,8 @@ static inline int free_area(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end, char *s)
>  static inline void poison_init_mem(void *s, size_t count)
>  {
>  	u32 *p = (u32 *)s;
> -	for (; count != 0; count -= 4)
> +	count /= sizeof(*p);
> +	for (; count != 0; count--)
>  		*p++ = 0xe7fddef0;
>  }
>  

Sigh. I really screwed that up badly. I wonder if we should instead
PAGE_ALIGN() the end address similar to what we're doing for the initrd
and then put a BUG_ON() inside poison_init_mem() that catches none page
aligned sizes.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-20 21:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-20 11:52 [PATCH] ARM: poison_init_mem: fixed underflow in loop Enrico Scholz
2013-02-20 21:56 ` Stephen Boyd

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox